Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28144763›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2017

High-dose Ig VENA is well tolerated and efficacious in patients with multifocal motor neuropathy.

Eduardo Nobile-Orazio, Dario Cocito, Chiara Briani, Rosaria Plasmati, Angelo Schenone, Francesca Gallia, Ivan Marjanovic, Anna Lotti Suffredini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. News on the journal Neurological Sciences in 2017.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Eduardo Nobile-OrazioDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine (BIOMETRA), Neuromuscular and Neuroimmunology Service, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, Milan University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy. eduardo.nobile@unimi.it.
Dario CocitoNeurology 2, Neuroscience Department, Turin University, Turin, Italy.
Chiara BrianiDepartment of Neurosciences, Padua University, Padua, Italy.
Rosaria PlasmatiIRCCS Neurological Sciences, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Angelo SchenoneDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal and Child Health, Genoa University, Genoa, Italy.
Francesca GalliaDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine (BIOMETRA), Neuromuscular and Neuroimmunology Service, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, Milan University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Ivan MarjanovicKedrion Biopharma, Medical Affairs, Castelvecchio Pascoli, Lucca, Italy.
Anna Lotti SuffrediniKedrion Biopharma, Medical Affairs, Castelvecchio Pascoli, Lucca, Italy.
Humanitas University · ITIMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca · ITInstitute of Neurological Sciences · ITKedrion (Italy) · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare, chronic, motor neuropathy that progressively impairs physical functioning and quality of life. Randomised controlled trials have shown that high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is superior to placebo in improving muscle strength and disability, but many patients require periodic infusions to maintain long-term improvement. This observational, multicentre, retrospective study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of human normal immunoglobulin (Ig VENA) at high intravenous infusion rates in 20 MMN patients (14 male, 6 female). Thirty days after the first infusion, there was an improvement of at least 1 point in two muscles compared to baseline on the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and of 1 point in the ONLS (Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale) scale in 15 patients (75%) and 10 patients (50%), respectively; 45% improved on both scales. At 6 months, 100% of 12 patients had improved on the MRC and 79% of 14 patients had improved on the ONLS scale; 83% improved on both scales. All reported adverse drug reactions (ADR) were mild, transient and possibly related to the study drug. Four patients (20%) reported ADRs, three reported headache and one fever. There were no serious or unexpected ADRs. By confirming that high-dose Ig VENA is efficacious and well tolerated, this study adds to the evidence base for IVIg in MMN and potentially increases clinicians' and patients' choice of therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDisability EvaluationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic FactorsMaleMiddle AgedPolyneuropathiesRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic FactorsEfficacyHigh doseIg VENAImmunoglobulin therapyMultifocal motor neuropathyTolerability

Identifiers

PMID28144763
OpenAlexW2584712826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.