ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2017
[Acute pancreatitis in intensive care medicine : Which risk score is useful?]
Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction and validation of risk prediction models for renal replacement therapy in patients with acute pancreatitis.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Predictive model of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis: a machine learning approach using the MIMIC-IV database.Renal failure · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a prediction model for the early occurrence of acute kidney injury in patients with acute pancreatitis.Renal failure · 2023Article
- Effects of acute kidney injury on acute pancreatitis patients' survival rate in intensive care unit: A retrospective study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- [41/f with belt-like upper abdominal pain : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: part 10].Der Internist · 2021Article
- Increased Mortality from Extrapancreatic Infections in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Pancreatitis.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute pancreatitis is a disease with an increasing incidence in the Western countries associated with a high mortality depending on severity of disease. Etiology is often biliary or due to alcoholism. Incidence of etiology varies between regions depending on risk-factor prevalence. Several risk scores are available to estimate mortality. The aim of the study is to identify the risk factors most relevant for patients being treated for severe acute pancreatitis in an ICU of a tertiary medical center. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe retrospective cohort study included 91 patients (61.2% men, mean age 52 years) with severe acute pancreatitis who were treated between 2002 and 2013 at the medical ICU of a tertiary medical center. Risk factors were identified using COX regression analysis and associations were assessed with the χ
resultsPulmonary failure necessitating ventilator support, renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, need for vasopressor therapy, positive blood cultures, and bleeding complications were identified as risk factors for high mortality in severe acute pancreatitis. Low calcium and high lactate levels are independent risk factors for mortality.
conclusionCritically ill patients with severe pancreatitis have high mortality rates that can be estimated using risk scores. Weighting of risk factors may differ depending on region and severity of disease. For patients included in our study, the Ranson Criteria and the APACHE II Score may be most applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.