ArticleIranian Red Crescent medical journal2016
Feasibility, Reliability, and Validity of the Iranian Version of the Quality of Life Questionnaire for Pregnancy.
Article in Iranian Red Crescent medical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of cognitive behavioral therapy-based counseling on perceived stress in pregnant women with history of primary infertility: a controlled randomized clinical trial.BMC psychiatry · 2021Trial
- Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability study of the Quality of Life Gravidarum (QOL-GRAV) scale.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- The effect of combined fig-Walnut syrup on functional constipation in pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial.Nutrition & metabolism · 2025Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life in Pregnant Women With Gestational Hypertension: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- The effect of cognitive-behavioral counseling with or withoutSleep and biological rhythms · 2023Article
- Quality of Life instruments and their psychometric properties for use in parents during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic scoping review.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2022Article
- Relationship of fear of COVID-19 and pregnancy-related quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic.Archives of psychiatric nursing · 2021Article
- Health-related quality of life and related factors among pregnant women.Journal of education and health promotion · 2020Article
- Factors Influencing Quality of Life during the First Trimester of Pregnancy: A Prospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical studies are giving increased importance to quality of life assessments as measures of the relative effectiveness of prevention and treatment programs used during pregnancy and antenatally.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to validate the Quality of life gravidarum (QOL-GRAV) questionnaire for Iranian women during the pregnant period. PATIENTS AND
methodsIn this cross-sectional methodological study, content validity following back and forward translation was assessed by a panel of experts. Using the two-stage cluster sampling method, 565 pregnant women referred to health care centers from April to June 2015 in Tabriz, Iran were enrolled in the study. Construct validity by assessing the factor structure, and convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated using scale-item correlations and known group analyses. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed in a sample of 30 pregnant women by the Cronbach's α coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).
resultsThe QOL-GRAV showed good content validity (CVI value = 0.95 and CVR value = 1), internal consistency (α = 0.79), and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.86). The results of the CFA for two-factor models indicate an acceptable fit of the proposed model (RMSEA; 90% CI = 0.083; 0.068-0.099, CFI = 0.95, GFI = 0.96, and AGFI = 0.92).
conclusionsThe findings support the validity and reliability of the Iranian version of the QOL-GRAV questionnaire. Therefore, it is recommended to be used for both clinical and research purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.