Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28143938›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Sequence-, structure-, and dynamics-based comparisons of structurally homologous CheY-like proteins.

Yi He, Gia G Maisuradze, Yanping Yin, Khatuna Kachlishvili, S Rackovsky, Harold A Scheraga

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Spatial Distribution of Local Mobility in Folded Proteins.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The structure of protein dynamic space.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. Two zinc-binding domains in the transporter AdcA fromThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi HeBaker Laboratory of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Gia G MaisuradzeBaker Laboratory of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Yanping YinBaker Laboratory of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Khatuna KachlishviliBaker Laboratory of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
S RackovskyBaker Laboratory of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Harold A ScheragaBaker Laboratory of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; has5@cornell.edu.
Cornell University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

INTERNAL BONDIN IN PROTEINSR01GM014312 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI MAISURADZE, GIA, RACKOVSKY, SHALOM R · 1985 to 2021
$9.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM014312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recently introduced a physically based approach to sequence comparison, the property factor method (PFM). In the present work, we apply the PFM approach to the study of a challenging set of sequences-the bacterial chemotaxis protein CheY, the N-terminal receiver domain of the nitrogen regulation protein NT-NtrC, and the sporulation response regulator Spo0F. These are all response regulators involved in signal transduction. Despite functional similarity and structural homology, they exhibit low sequence identity. PFM sequence comparison demonstrates a statistically significant qualitative difference between the sequence of CheY and those of the other two proteins that is not found using conventional alignment methods. This difference is shown to be consonant with structural characteristics, using distance matrix comparisons. We also demonstrate that residues participating strongly in native contacts during unfolding are distributed differently in CheY than in the other two proteins. The PFM result is also in accord with dynamic simulation results of several types. Molecular dynamics simulations of all three proteins were carried out at several temperatures, and it is shown that the dynamics of CheY are predicted to differ from those of NT-NtrC and Spo0F. The predicted dynamic properties of the three proteins are in good agreement with experimentally determined B factors and with fluctuations predicted by the Gaussian network model. We pinpoint the differences between the PFM and traditional sequence comparisons and discuss the informatic basis for the ability of the PFM approach to detect physical differences between these sequences that are not apparent from traditional alignment-based comparison.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsBinding SitesComputational BiologyMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis ProteinsModels, MolecularProtein DomainsSequence AlignmentSequence Homology, Amino AcidSignal TransductionBacterial ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis Proteinsall-atom simulationsamino acid physical propertiesprotein fluctuations

Identifiers

PMID28143938
PMCPMC5321002
OpenAlexW2584676873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.