Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28143805›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2017

Assessing the Influence of a Fitbit Physical Activity Monitor on the Exercise Practices of Emergency Medicine Residents: A Pilot Study.

Justin David Schrager, Philip Shayne, Sarah Wolf, Shamie Das, Rachel Elizabeth Patzer, Melissa White, Sheryl Heron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Inter-Device Agreement between Fitbit Flex 1 and 2 for Assessing Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Wellness: Combating Burnout and Its Consequences in Emergency Medicine.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Health of Health Care Professionals.American journal of lifestyle medicine
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Justin David SchragerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2291-8640
Philip ShayneDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5470-3236
Sarah WolfDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8548-6764
Shamie DasDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7766-3468
Rachel Elizabeth PatzerDepartment of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2573-9963
Melissa WhiteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5558-9946
Sheryl HeronDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9987-2073

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTargeted interventions have improved physical activity and wellness of medical residents. However, no exercise interventions have focused on emergency medicine residents.

objectiveThis study aimed to measure the effectiveness of a wearable device for tracking physical activity on the exercise habits and wellness of this population, while also measuring barriers to adoption and continued use.

methodsThis pre-post cohort study enrolled 30 emergency medicine residents. Study duration was 6 months. Statistical comparisons were conducted for the primary end point and secondary exercise end points with nonparametric tests. Descriptive statistics were provided for subjective responses.

resultsThe physical activity tracker did not increase the overall self-reported median number of days of physical activity per week within this population: baseline 2.5 days (interquartile range, IQR, 1.9) versus 2.8 days (IQR 1.5) at 1 month (P=.36). There was a significant increase in physical activity from baseline to 1 month among residents with median weekly physical activity level below that recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at study start, that is, 1.5 days (IQR 0.9) versus 2.4 days (IQR 1.2; P=.04), to 2.0 days (IQR 2.0; P=.04) at 6 months. More than half (60%, 18/30) of participants reported a benefit to their overall wellness, and 53% (16/30) reported a benefit to their physical activity. Overall continued use of the device was 67% (20/30) at 1 month and 33% (10/30) at 6 months.

conclusionsThe wearable physical activity tracker did not change the overall physical activity levels among this population of emergency medicine residents. However, there was an improvement in physical activity among the residents with the lowest preintervention physical activity. Subjective improvements in overall wellness and physical activity were noted among the entire study population.

Indexed as

activity trackersmedical residencymobile healthpersonal fitness trackersphysical fitness trackerswellness programs

Identifiers

PMID28143805
PMCPMC5309436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.