Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28143547›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

The effect of an organizational level participatory intervention in secondary vocational education on work-related health outcomes: results of a controlled trial.

Roosmarijn M C Schelvis, Noortje M Wiezer, Allard J van der Beek, Jos W R Twisk, Ernst T Bohlmeijer, Karen M Oude Hengel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Burnout syndrome and minor mental disorders in public employees.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Roosmarijn M C SchelvisNetherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Work, Health and Technology, P.O. Box 3005, NL-2301 DA, Leiden, The Netherlands. roos.schelvis@tno.nl.
Noortje M WiezerNetherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Work, Health and Technology, P.O. Box 3005, NL-2301 DA, Leiden, The Netherlands. noortje.wiezer@tno.nl.
Allard J van der BeekBody@Work, Research Center on Physical Activity, Work and Health, TNO-VUmc, P.O. Box 3005, NL-2301 DA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jos W R TwiskDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1089a, Amsterdam, NL-1081 HV, The Netherlands.
Ernst T BohlmeijerDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, P. O. Box 217, NL-7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Karen M Oude HengelNetherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Work, Health and Technology, P.O. Box 3005, NL-2301 DA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NLUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWork-related stress is highly prevalent in the educational sector. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an organizational level, participatory intervention on need for recovery and vitality in educational workers. It was hypothesized that the intervention would decrease need for recovery and increase vitality.

methodsA quasi-experiment was conducted at two secondary Vocational Education and Training schools (N = 356) with 12- and 24-months follow-up measurements. The intervention consisted of 1) a needs assessment phase, wherein staff and teachers developed actions for happy and healthy working under supervision of a facilitator, and 2) an implementation phase, wherein these actions were implemented by the management teams. Mixed model analysis was applied in order to assess the differences between the intervention and control group on average over time. All analyses were corrected for baseline values and several covariates.

resultsNo effects of the intervention were found on need for recovery, vitality and most of the secondary outcomes. Two small, statistically significant effects were in unfavorable direction: the intervention group scored on average over time significantly lower on absorption (i.e. a subscale of work engagement) and organizational efficacy than the control group.

conclusionsSince no beneficial effects of this intervention were found on the primary and most of the secondary outcomes, further implementation of the intervention in its current form is not eligible. We recommend that future organizational level interventions for occupational health 1) incorporate an elaborate implementation strategy, 2) are more specific in relating actions to stressors in the context, and 3) are integrated with secondary preventive, individual focused stress management interventions.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register NTR3284 (date registered: February 14 2012).

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleNetherlandsOccupational DiseasesOccupational HealthSchoolsVocational EducationYoung AdultSelf-efficacyTeacherWell-beingWork-related stress

Identifiers

PMID28143547
PMCPMC5282626
OpenAlexW2583316072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.