Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28143523›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2017

Immune and biochemical responses in skin differ between bovine hosts genetically susceptible and resistant to the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.

Alessandra Mara Franzin, Sandra Regina Maruyama, Gustavo Rocha Garcia, Rosane Pereira Oliveira, José Marcos Chaves Ribeiro, Richard Bishop, Antônio Augusto Mendes Maia, Daniela Dantas Moré, Beatriz Rossetti Ferreira, Isabel Kinney Ferreira de Miranda Santos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Analysis of Runs of Homozygosity in Aberdeen Angus Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Differences betweenAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Volatile Cues Influence Host-Choice in Arthropod Pests.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Alessandra Mara FranzinDepartament of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049-900, Brazil.
Sandra Regina MaruyamaDepartament of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049-900, Brazil.
Gustavo Rocha GarciaDepartament of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049-900, Brazil.
Rosane Pereira OliveiraDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
José Marcos Chaves RibeiroLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Richard BishopInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Antônio Augusto Mendes MaiaDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Animal Science and Food Technology, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Daniela Dantas MoréDepartament of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049-900, Brazil.
Beatriz Rossetti FerreiraRibeirão Preto School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Isabel Kinney Ferreira de Miranda SantosDepartament of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049-900, Brazil. imsantos@fmrp.usp.br.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of California, Davis · USWashington State University · US

Funding

Vector-Borne Diseases: Biology Of Vector Host RelationshipZIAAI000810 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI RIBEIRO, JOSE · 2009 to 2025
$20.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTicks attach to and penetrate their hosts' skin and inactivate multiple components of host responses in order to acquire a blood meal. Infestation loads with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus microplus, are heritable: some breeds carry high loads of reproductively successful ticks, whereas in others, few ticks feed and reproduce efficiently.

methodsIn order to elucidate the mechanisms that result in the different outcomes of infestations with cattle ticks, we examined global gene expression and inflammation induced by tick bites in skins from one resistant and one susceptible breed of cattle that underwent primary infestations with larvae and nymphs of R. microplus. We also examined the expression profiles of genes encoding secreted tick proteins that mediate parasitism in larvae and nymphs feeding on these breeds.

resultsFunctional analyses of differentially expressed genes in the skin suggest that allergic contact-like dermatitis develops with ensuing production of IL-6, CXCL-8 and CCL-2 and is sustained by HMGB1, ISG15 and PKR, leading to expression of pro-inflammatory chemokines and cytokines that recruit granulocytes and T lymphocytes. Importantly, this response is delayed in susceptible hosts. Histopathological analyses of infested skins showed inflammatory reactions surrounding tick cement cones that enable attachment in both breeds, but in genetically tick-resistant bovines they destabilized the cone. The transcription data provided insights into tick-mediated activation of basophils, which have previously been shown to be a key to host resistance in model systems. Skin from tick-susceptible bovines expressed more transcripts encoding enzymes that detoxify tissues. Interestingly, these enzymes also produce volatile odoriferous compounds and, accordingly, skin rubbings from tick-susceptible bovines attracted significantly more tick larvae than rubbings from resistant hosts. Moreover, transcripts encoding secreted modulatory molecules by the tick were significantly more abundant in larval and in nymphal salivary glands from ticks feeding on susceptible bovines.

conclusionsCompared with tick-susceptible hosts, genes encoding enzymes producing volatile compounds exhibit significantly lower expression in resistant hosts, which may render them less attractive to larvae; resistant hosts expose ticks to an earlier inflammatory response, which in ticks is associated with significantly lower expression of genes encoding salivary proteins that suppress host immunity, inflammation and coagulation.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAnimalsArthropod ProteinsCattleCattle DiseasesCytokinesDermatitisDisease SusceptibilityGene Expression ProfilingHost-Parasite InteractionsInflammationInterleukin-6LarvaNymphRhipicephalusSkinArthropod ProteinsCytokinesInterleukin-6Bos indicusBos taurusDifferentially expressed genesRhipicephalus microplusSalivary glandsSkinTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID28143523
PMCPMC5282843
OpenAlexW2584003481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.