Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28143496›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017

Efficacy of paracetamol, diclofenac and advice for acute low back pain in general practice: design of a randomized controlled trial (PACE Plus).

M Schreijenberg, P A J Luijsterburg, Y D M Van Trier, D Rizopoulos, M A Koopmanschap, L Voogt, C G Maher, B W Koes

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M SchreijenbergDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.schreijenberg@erasmusmc.nl.
P A J LuijsterburgDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Y D M Van TrierDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
D RizopoulosDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M A KoopmanschapDepartment of Health Policy and Management/iMTA, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
L VoogtDutch Association for Back pain Patients 'The Spine', Bentinckstraat 21, Lichtenvoorde, The Netherlands.
C G MaherThe George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, PO Box M201, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.
B W KoesDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow back pain is common and associated with a considerable burden to patients and society. There is uncertainty regarding the relative benefit of paracetamol and diclofenac and regarding the additional effect of pain medication compared with advice only in patients with acute low back pain. This trial will assess the effectiveness of paracetamol, diclofenac and placebo for acute low back pain over a period of 4 weeks. Furthermore, this trial will assess the additional effectiveness of paracetamol, diclofenac and placebo compared with advice only for acute low back pain over a period of 4 weeks.

methodsThe PACE Plus trial is a multi-center, placebo-blinded, superiority randomized controlled trial in primary care, with a follow-up of 12 weeks. Patients with acute low back pain aged 18-60 years presenting in general practice will be included. Patients are randomized into four groups: 1) Advice only (usual care conforming with the clinical guideline of the Dutch College of General Practitioners); 2) Advice and paracetamol; 3) Advice and diclofenac; 4) Advice and placebo. The primary outcome is low back pain intensity measured with a numerical rating scale (0-10). Secondary outcomes include compliance to treatment, disability, perceived recovery, costs, adverse reactions, satisfaction, sleep quality, co-interventions and adequacy of blinding. Between group differences for low back pain intensity will be evaluated using a repeated measurements analysis with linear effects models. An economic evaluation will be performed using a cost-effectiveness analysis with low back pain intensity and a cost-utility analysis with quality of life. Explorative analyses will be performed to assess effect modification by predefined variables. Ethical approval has been granted. Trial results will be released to an appropriate peer-viewed journal. DISCUSSION: This paper presents the design of the PACE Plus trial: a multi-center, placebo-blinded, superiority randomized controlled trial in primary care that will assess the effectiveness of advice only, paracetamol, diclofenac and placebo for acute low back pain.

trial registrationDutch Trial Registration NTR6089 , registered September 14th, 2016. PROTOCOL: Version 4, June 2016.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacDirective CounselingHumansLow Back PainResearch DesignAcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacAcetaminophenAnalgesicsAnti-inflammatory agentsClinical trialDiclofenacGeneral practiceGeneral practitionersLow back painNon-steroidalPainRandomized controlled trialTherapy

Identifiers

PMID28143496
PMCPMC5286693
OpenAlexW2584541790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.