Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28143413›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2017

Use of the EMPOWER brochure to deprescribe sedative-hypnotic drugs in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

Philippe Martin, Cara Tannenbaum

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01148186 phase4terminatednot on this map

The Patient as a Driver of Change: an Intervention Study to Reduce the Use and Impact of Potentially Inappropriate Medications Among Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de MontrealRan2010 to 2013Enrolled300ConditionsPolypharmacy, Incontinence, Insomnia, AnxietyArmsknowledge transfer tool
NCT04855578 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

GABA-WHY Study: Deprescription of Gabapentinoids in Medical Inpatients

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreRan2021 to 2023Enrolled160ConditionsPolypharmacy, Gabapentin, PregabalinArmsIn-Hopsital Patient Educational Brochure, Physician Education about Gabapentinoid Prescription
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philippe MartinInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Université de Montréal, 4545 Queen Mary Road, Montreal, QC, H3W 1W5, Canada. philippe.martin@umontreal.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-0053-6617
Cara TannenbaumInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Université de Montréal, 4545 Queen Mary Road, Montreal, QC, H3W 1W5, Canada.
Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel · CAInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal · CA

Funding

CIHR CIHR-2009MOP-201314-KTE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based mailed educational brochures about the harms of sedative-hypnotic use lead to discontinuation of chronic benzodiazepine use in older adults. It remains unknown whether patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are able to understand the information in the EMPOWER brochures, and whether they achieve similar rates of benzodiazepine discontinuation.

methodsPost-hoc analysis of the EMPOWER randomized, double-blind, wait-list controlled trial that assessed the effect of a direct-to-consumer educational intervention on benzodiazepine discontinuation. 303 community-dwelling chronic users of benzodiazepine medication aged 65-95 years were recruited from general community pharmacies in the original trial, 261 (86%) of which completed the trial extension phase. All participants of the control arm received the EMPOWER brochure during the trial extension. Normal cognition (n = 139) or MCI (n = 122) was determined during baseline cognitive testing using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire. Changes in knowledge pre- and post-intervention were assessed with a knowledge questionnaire and changes in beliefs were calculated using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire. Logistic regression was used to compare knowledge gained, change in beliefs and benzodiazepine cessation rates between participants with and without MCI.

resultsComplete discontinuation of benzodiazepines was achieved in 39 (32.0% [24.4,40.7]) participants with MCI and in 53 (38.1% [30.5,46.4]) with normal cognition (adjusted OR 0.79, 95% CI [0.45-1.38]). Compared to individuals with normal cognition, MCI had no effect on the acquisition of new knowledge, change in beliefs about benzodiazepines or elicitation of cognitive dissonance.

conclusionsThe EMPOWER brochure is effective for reducing benzodiazepines in community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

trial registrationOur ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT01148186 , June 21

Indexed as

PamphletsWaiting ListsAgedAged, 80 and overBenzodiazepinesCognitive DysfunctionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansHypnotics and SedativesMalePatient Education as TopicBenzodiazepinesHypnotics and SedativesBenzodiazepinesDeprescribingDiscontinuationInappropriate prescriptionPatient education

Identifiers

PMID28143413
PMCPMC5282809
OpenAlexW2580999687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.