Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28142193›Full record

ReviewMolecular microbiology2017

Staphylococcus aureus biofilm: a complex developmental organism.

Derek E Moormeier, Kenneth W Bayles

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 307 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
307citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

307 citing papers in PubMed, 524 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ImagingmBio · 2026
    Article
  5. Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Virulence Profiling of Multidrug-Resistant ClinicalMicrobial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ecological Dynamics ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Effect ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article

247 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Derek E MoormeierCenter for Staphylococcal Research, Department of Pathology & Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Kenneth W BaylesCenter for Staphylococcal Research, Department of Pathology & Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9521-3540
University of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

The S. aureus biofilm lifecycleP01AI083211 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAYLES, KENNETH W. · 2009 to 2023
$32.1M
The molecular control of bacterial autolysisR01AI038901 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAYLES, KENNETH W. · 2003 to 2012
$3.1M
The molecular control of bacterial programmed cell deathR01AI125589 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAYLES, KENNETH W. · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI083211NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI038901NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic biofilm-associated infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus often lead to significant increases in morbidity and mortality, particularly when associated with indwelling medical devices. This has triggered a great deal of research attempting to understand the molecular mechanisms that control S. aureus biofilm formation and the basis for the recalcitrance of these multicellular structures to antibiotic therapy. The purpose of this review is to summarize our current understanding of S. aureus biofilm development, focusing on the description of a newly-defined, five-stage model of biofilm development and the mechanisms required for each stage. Importantly, this model includes an alternate view of the processes involved in microcolony formation in S. aureus and suggests that these structures originate as a result of stochastically regulated metabolic heterogeneity and proliferation within a maturing biofilm population, rather than a subtractive process involving the release of cell clusters from a thick, unstructured biofilm. Importantly, it is proposed that this new model of biofilm development involves the genetically programmed generation of metabolically distinct subpopulations of cells, resulting in an overall population that is better able to adapt to rapidly changing environmental conditions.

Indexed as

BiofilmsStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID28142193
PMCPMC5397344
OpenAlexW2595011271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.