Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28141929›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of managed care2017

Alignment of breast cancer screening guidelines, accountability metrics, and practice patterns.

Tracy Onega, Jennifer S Haas, Asaf Bitton, Charles Brackett, Julie Weiss, Martha Goodrich, Kimberly Harris, Steve Pyle, Anna N A Tosteson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of managed care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06305312 (Community Services Navigation to Advance Health Equity in Breast Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06305312 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Community Services Navigation to Advance Health Equity in Breast Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2024 to 2028Enrolled1,450ConditionsBreast CancerArmsCommunity Service Navigation, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multi-level Influences on Breast Cancer Screening in Primary Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tracy Onega
Jennifer S Haas
Asaf Bitton
Charles Brackett
Julie Weiss
Martha GoodrichGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Medical Center Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756. E-mail: Martha.e.goodrich@dartmouth.edu.
Kimberly Harris
Steve Pyle
Anna N A Tosteson

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Risk-based Imaging Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Surveillance OutcomesP01CA154292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Diana L Miglioretti · 2011 to 2026
$52.9M
Promoting personalized decisions for breast cancer screening for women AND theirU54CA163307 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI HAAS, JENNIFER S, ONEGA, TRACY · 2011 to 2017
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA154292NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBreast cancer screening guidelines and metrics are inconsistent with each other and may differ from breast screening practice patterns in primary care. This study measured breast cancer screening practice patterns in relation to common evidence-based guidelines and accountability metrics. STUDY

designCohort study using primary data collected from a regional breast cancer screening research network between 2011 and 2014.

methodsUsing information on women aged 30 to 89 years within 21 primary care practices of 2 large integrated health systems in New England, we measured the proportion of women screened overall and by age using 2 screening definition categories: any mammogram and screening mammogram.

resultsOf the 81,352 women in our cohort, 54,903 (67.5%) had at least 1 mammogram during the time period, 48,314 (59.4%) had a screening mammogram. Women aged 50 to 69 years were the highest proportion screened (82.4% any mammogram, 75% screening indication); 72.6% of women at age 40 had a screening mammogram with a median of 70% (range = 54.3%-84.8%) among the practices. Of women aged at least 75 years, 63.3% had a screening mammogram, with the median of 63.9% (range = 37.2%-78.3%) among the practices. Of women who had 2 or more mammograms, 79.5% were screened annually.

conclusionsPrimary care practice patterns for breast cancer screening are not well aligned with some evidence-based guidelines and accountability metrics. Metrics and incentives should be designed with more uniformity and should also include shared decision making when the evidence does not clearly support one single conclusion.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID28141929
PMCPMC5546912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.