Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28141865›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2017

Customised and Noncustomised Birth Weight Centiles and Prediction of Stillbirth and Infant Mortality and Morbidity: A Cohort Study of 979,912 Term Singleton Pregnancies in Scotland.

Stamatina Iliodromiti, Daniel F Mackay, Gordon C S Smith, Jill P Pell, Naveed Sattar, Debbie A Lawlor, Scott M Nelson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Perinatal outcomes after selective third-trimester ultrasound screening for small-for-gestational age: prospective cohort study nested within DESiGN randomized controlled trial.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Characteristics associated with antenatally unidentified small-for-gestational-age fetuses: prospective cohort study nested within DESiGN randomized controlled trial.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Factors affecting the umbilical artery Doppler reference values in the second and third trimesters.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Routine 36-week scan: prediction of prolonged neonatal intensive care unit admission.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fetal Growth Restriction: A Pragmatic Approach.American journal of perinatology · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stamatina IliodromitiSchool of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Daniel F MackayInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Gordon C S SmithDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Rosie Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2124-0997
Jill P PellInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Naveed SattarInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Debbie A LawlorMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6793-2262
Scott M NelsonSchool of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/5Medical Research Council MR/N015177/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited evidence to support the use of customised centile charts to identify those at risk of stillbirth and infant death at term. We sought to determine birth weight thresholds at which mortality and morbidity increased and the predictive ability of noncustomised (accounting for gestational age and sex) and partially customised centiles (additionally accounting for maternal height and parity) to identify fetuses at risk.

methodsThis is a population-based linkage study of 979,912 term singleton pregnancies in Scotland, United Kingdom, between 1992 and 2010. The main exposures were noncustomised and partially customised birth weight centiles. The primary outcomes were infant death, stillbirth, overall mortality (infant and stillbirth), Apgar score <7 at 5 min, and admission to the neonatal unit. Optimal thresholds that predicted outcomes for both non- and partially customised birth weight centiles were calculated. Prediction of mortality between non- and partially customised birth weight centiles was compared using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) and net reclassification index (NRI).

findingsBirth weight ≤25th centile was associated with higher risk for all mortality and morbidity outcomes. For stillbirth, low Apgar score, and neonatal unit admission, risk also increased from the 85th centile. Similar patterns and magnitude of associations were observed for both non- and partially customised birth weight centiles. Partially customised birth weight centiles did not improve the discrimination of mortality (AUROC 0.61 [95%CI 0.60, 0.62]) compared with noncustomised birth weight centiles (AUROC 0.62 [95%CI 0.60, 0.63]) and slightly underperformed in reclassifying pregnancies to different risk categories for both fatal and non-fatal adverse outcomes (NRI -0.027 [95% CI -0.039, -0.016], p < 0.001). We were unable to fully customise centile charts because we lacked data on maternal weight and ethnicity. Additional analyses in an independent UK cohort (n = 10,515) suggested that lack of data on ethnicity in this population (in which national statistics show 98% are white British) and maternal weight would have misclassified ~15% of the large-for-gestation fetuses.

conclusionsAt term, birth weight remains strongly associated with the risk of stillbirth and infant death and neonatal morbidity. Partial customisation does not improve prediction performance. Consideration of early term delivery or closer surveillance for those with a predicted birth weight ≤25th or ≥85th centile may reduce adverse outcomes. Replication of the analysis with fully customised centiles accounting for ethnicity is warranted.

Indexed as

Apgar ScoreBirth WeightHospitalizationInfant MortalityAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleMorbidityPregnancyScotlandStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID28141865
PMCPMC5283655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.