Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28141820›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2017

The missing link: Predicting connectomes from noisy and partially observed tract tracing data.

Max Hinne, Annet Meijers, Rembrandt Bakker, Paul H E Tiesinga, Morten Mørup, Marcel A J van Gerven

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predictability of cortico-cortical connections in the mammalian brain.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Generative models for network neuroscience: prospects and promise.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Max HinneRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Annet MeijersRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Rembrandt BakkerInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Institute for Advanced Simulation and JARA BRAIN Institute I, Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2942-2691
Paul H E TiesingaRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Morten MørupTechnical University of Denmark, DTU Compute, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Marcel A J van GervenRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2206-9098

Funding

Lundbeck Foundation R105-9813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of the wiring map of the brain, known as the connectome, has increased greatly in the last decade, mostly due to technological advancements in neuroimaging techniques and improvements in computational tools to interpret the vast amount of available data. Despite this, with the exception of the C. elegans roundworm, no definitive connectome has been established for any species. In order to obtain this, tracer studies are particularly appealing, as these have proven highly reliable. The downside of tract tracing is that it is costly to perform, and can only be applied ex vivo. In this paper, we suggest that instead of probing all possible connections, hitherto unknown connections may be predicted from the data that is already available. Our approach uses a 'latent space model' that embeds the connectivity in an abstract physical space. Regions that are close in the latent space have a high chance of being connected, while regions far apart are most likely disconnected in the connectome. After learning the latent embedding from the connections that we did observe, the latent space allows us to predict connections that have not been probed previously. We apply the methodology to two connectivity data sets of the macaque, where we demonstrate that the latent space model is successful in predicting unobserved connectivity, outperforming two baselines and an alternative model in nearly all cases. Furthermore, we show how the latent spatial embedding may be used to integrate multimodal observations (i.e. anterograde and retrograde tracers) for the mouse neocortex. Finally, our probabilistic approach enables us to make explicit which connections are easy to predict and which prove difficult, allowing for informed follow-up studies.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsArtifactsBrainCerebral CortexComputer SimulationConnectomeDiffusion Tensor ImagingMacacaModels, AnatomicModels, StatisticalSample SizeSignal-To-Noise RatioWhite Matter

Identifiers

PMID28141820
PMCPMC5308841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.