Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28140791›Full record

ArticleRadiation research2017

Impact of Neutron Exposure on Global Gene Expression in a Human Peripheral Blood Model.

Constantinos G Broustas, Yanping Xu, Andrew D Harken, Mashkura Chowdhury, Guy Garty, Sally A Amundson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Modeling the Effects of Protracted Cosmic Radiation in a Human Organ-on-Chip Platform.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Transcriptomics for radiation biodosimetry: progress and challenges.International journal of radiation biology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The transcriptomic revolution and radiation biology.International journal of radiation biology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Constantinos G Broustasa   Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 10032; and.
Yanping Xub   Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University, Irvington, New York 10533.
Andrew D Harkenb   Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University, Irvington, New York 10533.
Mashkura Chowdhurya   Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 10032; and.
Guy Gartyb   Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University, Irvington, New York 10533.
Sally A Amundsona   Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 10032; and.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Sample Engineering CoreU19AI067773 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FORNACE, ALBERT J · 2005 to 2024
$105.4M
TR&D 3P41EB002033 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BRENNER, DAVID JONATHAN · 2003 to 2018
$17.0M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067773NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detonation of an improvised nuclear device would produce prompt radiation consisting of both photons (gamma rays) and neutrons. While much effort in recent years has gone into the development of radiation biodosimetry methods suitable for mass triage, the possible effect of neutrons on the endpoints studied has remained largely uninvestigated. We have used a novel neutron irradiator with an energy spectrum based on that 1-1.5 km from the epicenter of the Hiroshima blast to begin examining the effect of neutrons on global gene expression, and the impact this may have on the development of gene expression signatures for radiation biodosimetry. We have exposed peripheral blood from healthy human donors to 0.1, 0.3, 0.5 or 1 Gy of neutrons ex vivo using our neutron irradiator, and compared the transcriptomic response 24 h later to that resulting from sham exposure or exposure to 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1, 2 or 4 Gy of photons (X rays). We identified 125 genes that responded significantly to both radiation qualities as a function of dose, with the magnitude of response to neutrons generally being greater than that seen after X-ray exposure. Gene ontology analysis suggested broad involvement of the p53 signaling pathway and general DNA damage response functions across all doses of both radiation qualities. Regulation of immune response and chromatin-related functions were implicated only following the highest doses of neutrons, suggesting a physiological impact of greater DNA damage. We also identified several genes that seem to respond primarily as a function of dose, with less effect of radiation quality. We confirmed this pattern of response by quantitative real-time RT-PCR for BAX, TNFRSF10B, ITLN2 and AEN and suggest that gene expression may provide a means to differentiate between total dose and a neutron component.

Indexed as

BloodBlood Physiological PhenomenaFemaleGene Expression RegulationGene OntologyHumansMaleNeutronsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisTranscriptomeX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID28140791
PMCPMC5525057
OpenAlexW2584624369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.