ReviewRadiation research2017
p53 and RAD9, the DNA Damage Response, and Regulation of Transcription Networks.
Review in Radiation research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Mechanisms of Age-Related Taste Dysfunction Deciphered by Spatiotemporal Transcriptomics.Aging cell · 2026Article
- From cell cycle control to cancer therapy: exploring the role of CDK1 and CDK2 in tumorigenesis.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Protein arginine methyltransferases as regulators of cellular stress.Experimental neurology · 2025Review
- Uterine fibroids show evidence of shared genetic architecture with blood pressure traits.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2025Article
- Research progress on the role of the NEIL family in cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Transcriptional inhibition after irradiation occurs preferentially at highly expressed genes in a manner dependent on cell cycle progression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Loss of fragile WWOX gene leads to senescence escape and genome instability.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Article
- Interactions between the DNA Damage Response and the Telomere Complex in Carcinogenesis: A Hypothesis.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Review
- The Role of Protein Arginine Methyltransferases in DNA Damage Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- The gut microbiota can be a potential regulator and treatment target of bone metastasis.Biochemical pharmacology · 2022Review
- Hypermethylation ofEXCLI journal · 2022Article
- Article
- FOXP1 and NDRG1 act differentially as downstream effectors of RAD9-mediated prostate cancer cell functions.Cellular signalling · 2021Article
- Hydroxygenkwanin Increases the Sensitivity of Liver Cancer Cells to Chemotherapy by Inhibiting DNA Damage Response in Mouse Xenograft Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Multi-Omics Approaches and Radiation on Lipid Metabolism in Toothed Whales.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- DNMT1 and DNMT3B regulate tumorigenicity of human prostate cancer cells by controlling RAD9 expression through targeted methylation.Carcinogenesis · 2021Article
- Article
- ATR signaling in mammalian meiosis: From upstream scaffolds to downstream signaling.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The way cells respond to DNA damage is important since inefficient repair or misrepair of lesions can have deleterious consequences, including mutation, genomic instability, neurodegenerative disorders, premature aging, cancer or death. Whether damage occurs spontaneously as a byproduct of normal metabolic processes, or after exposure to exogenous agents, cells muster a coordinated, complex DNA damage response (DDR) to mitigate potential harmful effects. A variety of activities are involved to promote cell survival, and include DNA repair, DNA damage tolerance, as well as transient cell cycle arrest to provide time for repair before entry into critical cell cycle phases, an event that could be lethal if traversal occurs while damage is present. When such damage is prolonged or not repairable, senescence, apoptosis or autophagy is induced. One major level of DDR regulation occurs via the orchestrated transcriptional control of select sets of genes encoding proteins that mediate the response. p53 is a transcription factor that transactivates specific DDR downstream genes through binding DNA consensus sequences usually in or near target gene promoter regions. The profile of p53-regulated genes activated at any given time varies, and is dependent upon type of DNA damage or stress experienced, exact composition of the consensus DNA binding sequence, presence of other DNA binding proteins, as well as cell context. RAD9 is another protein critical for the response of cells to DNA damage, and can also selectively regulate gene transcription. The limited studies addressing the role of RAD9 in transcription regulation indicate that the protein transactivates at least one of its target genes, p21/waf1/cip1, by binding to DNA sequences demonstrated to be a p53 response element. NEIL1 is also regulated by RAD9 through a similar DNA sequence, though not yet directly verified as a bonafide p53 response element. These findings suggest a novel pathway whereby p53 and RAD9 control the DDR through a shared mechanism involving an overlapping network of downstream target genes. Details and unresolved questions about how these proteins coordinate or compete to execute the DDR through transcriptional reprogramming, as well as biological implications, are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.