Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28140693›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology2017

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of tedizolid for the treatment of skin infections.

Darrell McBride, Tamara Krekel, Kevin Hsueh, Michael J Durkin

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Attitudes of physicians from 10 European countries on adherence and how treatment modalities in ABSSSI affect adherence: results from a Delphi survey.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Darrell McBridea Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases , Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis , MO , USA.
Tamara Krekelb Department of Pharmacy , Barnes-Jewish Hospital , St. Louis , MO , USA.
Kevin Hsueha Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases , Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis , MO , USA.
Michael J Durkina Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases , Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis , MO , USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USBarnes-Jewish Hospital · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (KL2) KL2TR002346 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Dominic N Reeds · 2017 to 2026
$14.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002346NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000609NIAID NIH HHS L30 AI133778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTedizolid is indicated for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Although tedizolid shares many similar properties with linezolid, another oxazolidinone used to treat ABSSSI, the two antibiotics have several key differences. Areas covered: This review provides a detailed summary of the overall pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of tedizolid for the treatment of ABSSSI. Expert opinion: Compared to other antibiotics used for ABSSSI, tedizolid has several advantages. Tedizolid has a long half-life, allowing for once daily dosing. Tedizolid also has broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Coagulase-negative Staphylococci, and Enterococci - including isolates demonstrating resistance to linezolid. It is available in both oral and intravenous formulations, and, has outstanding oral bioavailability, allowing for oral-step down therapy. There is also some evidence that, tedizolid has fewer significant interactions with serotonin reuptake inhibitors or monoamine oxidase inhibitors than linezolid. Finally, thrombocytopenia may occur less often with tedizolid than linezolid. However, these benefits must be weighed against the financial cost of tedizolid and the availability of alternative antibiotic choices.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological AvailabilityDrug InteractionsHalf-LifeHumansOrganophosphatesOxazolesSkin Diseases, BacterialSoft Tissue InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsOrganophosphatesOxazolestedizolid phosphateand acute bacterial skin and skin structure infectionsgram-positive infectionslinezolidnew antibioticsoxazolidinonespharmacokineticsskin and soft tissue infectionsTedizolid

Identifiers

PMID28140693
PMCPMC8007045
OpenAlexW2584912869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.