Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28140396›Full record

SynthesisScientific data2017

A 4-study replication of the moderating effects of greed on socioeconomic status and unethical behaviour.

Anjana Balakrishnan, Paolo A Palma, Joshua Patenaude, Lorne Campbell

RetractedErratum issuedAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific data, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Distrust as a form of inequality.Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. No evidence that economic inequality moderates the effect of income on generosity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anjana BalakrishnanWestern University, Department of Psychology, London, N6A 3K7 Ontario, Canada.
Paolo A PalmaWestern University, Department of Psychology, London, N6A 3K7 Ontario, Canada.
Joshua PatenaudeWestern University, Department of Psychology, London, N6A 3K7 Ontario, Canada.
Lorne CampbellWestern University, Department of Psychology, London, N6A 3K7 Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9071-4845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four replications of Piff and colleagues' study examined the moderating effects of greed attitudes on the relationship between socio-economic status (SES) and unethical behaviour (Study 7). In the original study, the researchers found that both greed and SES predicted increased propensity to engage in unethical behavior. Furthermore, this association was moderated such that the effects of SES on unethical behaviour were no longer present in the greed prime condition versus the neutral condition. In replication 1 of the original study main effects of greed attitudes and SES were found, but no interaction was found. Main effects for greed emerged in replications 3 and 4. However no main effects for SES or interactions emerged for replications 2-4. A meta-analysis was conducted with all replications and the original study, and found no moderating effect of greed on the relationship between SES and unethical behavior.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorSocial ClassDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID28140396
PMCPMC5283063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.