Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28140321›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Systematic Review of the Association between Dairy Product Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular-Related Clinical Outcomes.

Jean-Philippe Drouin-Chartier, Didier Brassard, Maude Tessier-Grenier, Julie Anne Côté, Marie-Ève Labonté, Sophie Desroches, Patrick Couture, Benoît Lamarche

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
31.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 273 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-Philippe Drouin-ChartierInstitute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Didier BrassardInstitute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Maude Tessier-GrenierInstitute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Julie Anne CôtéInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Marie-Ève LabontéDepartment of Nutritional Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and.
Sophie DesrochesInstitute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Patrick CoutureInstitute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Benoît LamarcheInstitute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; benoit.lamarche@fsaa.ulaval.ca.
Université Laval · CAInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR MFE-140953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review was to determine if dairy product consumption is detrimental, neutral, or beneficial to cardiovascular health and if the recommendation to consume reduced-fat as opposed to regular-fat dairy is evidence-based. A systematic review of meta-analyses of prospective population studies associating dairy consumption with cardiovascular disease (CVD), coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, hypertension, metabolic syndrome (MetS), and type 2 diabetes (T2D) was conducted on the basis of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. Quality of evidence was rated by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation scale. High-quality evidence supports favorable associations between total dairy intake and hypertension risk and between low-fat dairy and yogurt intake and the risk of T2D. Moderate-quality evidence suggests favorable associations between intakes of total dairy, low-fat dairy, cheese, and fermented dairy and the risk of stroke; intakes of low-fat dairy and milk and the risk of hypertension; total dairy and milk consumption and the risk of MetS; and total dairy and cheese and the risk of T2D. High- to moderate-quality evidence supports neutral associations between the consumption of total dairy, cheese, and yogurt and CVD risk; the consumption of any form of dairy, except for fermented, and CAD risk; the consumption of regular- and high-fat dairy, milk, and yogurt and stroke risk; the consumption of regular- and high-fat dairy, cheese, yogurt, and fermented dairy and hypertension risk; and the consumption of regular- and high-fat dairy, milk, and fermented dairy and T2D risk. Data from this systematic review indicate that the consumption of various forms of dairy products shows either favorable or neutral associations with cardiovascular-related clinical outcomes. The review also emphasizes that further research is urgently needed to compare the impact of low-fat with regular- and high-fat dairy on cardiovascular-related clinical outcomes in light of current recommendations to consume low-fat dairy.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDairy ProductsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DietFeeding BehaviorMetabolic SyndromeCoronary Artery DiseaseDietary FatsHumansHypertensionStrokeDietary Fatscardiovascular diseasecheesecoronary artery diseasedairyhypertensionmetabolic syndromemilkstroketype 2 diabetesyogurt

Identifiers

PMID28140321
PMCPMC5105032
OpenAlexW2553359562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.