Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28139675›Full record

ArticleNature methods2017

Win-win data sharing in neuroscience.

Giorgio A Ascoli, Patricia Maraver, Sumit Nanda, Sridevi Polavaram, Rubén Armañanzas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Principles of intensive human neuroimaging.Trends in neurosciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cell morphologies in the nervous system: Glia steal the limelight.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Circuit analysis of theNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giorgio A AscoliCenter for Neural Informatics, Structures, and Plasticity Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
Patricia MaraverCenter for Neural Informatics, Structures, and Plasticity Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
Sumit NandaCenter for Neural Informatics, Structures, and Plasticity Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
Sridevi PolavaramCenter for Neural Informatics, Structures, and Plasticity Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
Rubén ArmañanzasCenter for Neural Informatics, Structures, and Plasticity Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.

Funding

Generation and Description of Neuronal Morphology and ConnectivityR01NS039600 · NINDS · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI ASCOLI, GIORGIO A · 1999 to 2024
$6.9M
Cytoskeletal mechanisms of dendrite arbor shape developmentR01NS086082 · NINDS · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ASCOLI, GIORGIO A, COX, DANIEL N · 2013 to 2023
$3.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039600NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most neuroscientists have yet to embrace a culture of data sharing. Using our decade-long experience at NeuroMorpho.Org as an example, we discuss how publicly available repositories may benefit data producers and end-users alike. We outline practical recipes for resource developers to maximize the research impact of data sharing platforms for both contributors and users.

Indexed as

NeurosciencesDatabases, FactualHumansInformation DisseminationInternet

Identifiers

PMID28139675
PMCPMC5503136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.