ArticleJournal of diabetes and its complications2017
Effect of different methods of accounting for antihypertensive treatment when assessing the relationship between diabetes or obesity and systolic blood pressure.
Article in Journal of diabetes and its complications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- How measurements affected by medication use are reported and handled in observational research: A literature review.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2022Review
- Changes in the body mass index and blood pressure association across time: Evidence from multiple cross-sectional and cohort studies.Preventive medicine · 2021Article
- American Indian chronic Renal insufficiency cohort study (AI-CRIC study).BMC nephrology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderlying blood pressure is that observed in the absence of antihypertensive treatment or, among those treated, the estimate of that which would be observed without treatment. This study aims to examine the relationships between diabetes or obesity and underlying systolic blood pressure adjusted for antihypertensive treatment by several methods.
methodsData from two population studies were analyzed-an American Indian community in Arizona and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Antihypertensive treatment was accounted for using: no adjustment; antihypertensive use as a covariate; blood pressure dichotomized into normotension and hypertension; addition of a fixed treatment effect; non-parametric algorithm; and censored normal regression.
resultsThe magnitude of association at each time point differed by adjustment method particularly where there was a difference in prevalence of antihypertensive use between people with and without diabetes or obesity. The common methods of ignoring antihypertensive treatment or including it as a covariate in a regression model underestimated the effects of diabetes and obesity on underlying blood pressure, compared to the recommended method of the censored normal regression.
conclusionProper accounting for antihypertensive treatment is needed in interpreting variables that affect blood pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.