Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28139305›Full record

Trial reportRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2017

Long-term outcome of phase I/II prospective study of dose-escalated proton therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Joe Y Chang, Wencheng Zhang, Ritsuko Komaki, Noah C Choi, Shen Chan, Daniel Gomez, Michael O'Reilly, Melenda Jeter, Michael Gillin, Xiaorong Zhu and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: the road ahead.Translational lung cancer research · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Proton Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. [Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Centrally Located Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Joe Y ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States. Electronic address: jychang@mdanderson.org.
Wencheng ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Ritsuko KomakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Noah C ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, MGH, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Shen ChanDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Daniel GomezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Michael O'ReillyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Melenda JeterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Michael GillinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Xiaorong ZhuDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Xiaodong ZhangDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Radhe MohanDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Stephen SwisherDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
Stephen HahnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
James D CoxDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Statistics, Data Exchange, Management and SupportP01CA021239 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DELANEY, THOMAS F · 1985 to 2013
$28.3M
U OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1RR024148 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2006 to 2010
$27.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA021239NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this phase I/II study was to assess the long-term clinical benefits and toxicities of proton beam therapy for medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND

methodsFrom June 2006 to September 2011, 35 patients with medically inoperable T1N0M0 (central or superior location, 12 patients) or T2-3N0M0 (any location, 23 patients) NSCLC were treated with 87.5Gy at 2.5Gy/fraction of proton therapy. Toxicities were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.

resultsThe median follow-up time was 83.1months (95% CI: 69.2-97.1months). For all 35 patients, the 1, 3, and 5-year overall survival rates were 85.7%, 42.9%, and 28.1%, respectively. The 5-year local recurrence-free, regional recurrence-free, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 85.0%, 89.2%, and 54.4%, respectively. Different T stages had no effect on local and regional recurrence (p=0.499, p=1.00). However, with the increase in T stages, the distant metastasis rate increased significantly (p=0.006). The most common adverse effects were dermatitis (grade 2, 51.4%; grade 3, 2.9%) and radiation pneumonitis (grade 2, 11.4%; grade 3, 2.9%). Other grade 2 toxicities included esophagitis (2.9%), rib fracture (2.9%), heart toxicities (5.7%), and chest wall pain (2.9%).

conclusionsAccording to our long-term follow-up data, proton therapy with ablative doses is well tolerated and effective in medically inoperable early-stage NSCLC. Systemic therapy should be considered to reduce the rate of distant metastasis in cases of T2 and T3 lesions.

Indexed as

Proton TherapyAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProspective StudiesRadiotherapy DosageSurvival RateEarly stageNon-small cell lung cancerPhase I/II studyProton therapySurvivalToxicity

Identifiers

PMID28139305
PMCPMC5319887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.