Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28139196›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Habitat and social factors shape individual decisions and emergent group structure during baboon collective movement.

Ariana Strandburg-Peshkin, Damien R Farine, Margaret C Crofoot, Iain D Couzin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
21.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Allocentric flocking.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Aggregation-diffusion in heterogeneous environments.Journal of mathematical biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The relative contribution of acoustic signals versus movement cues in group coordination and collective decision-making.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Individual and ecological heterogeneity promote complex communication in social vertebrate group decisions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Dynamics of collective motion across time and species.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Ariana Strandburg-PeshkinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2985-6788
Damien R FarineDepartment of Collective Behaviour, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2208-7613
Margaret C CrofootDepartment of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States.
Iain D CouzinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.
University of Konstanz · DEPrinceton University · USSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PA

Funding

Quantitavie and Computational Biology Graduate ProgramT32HG003284 · NHGRI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Joshua Michael Akey, Stanislav Y. Shvartsman · 2004 to 2026
$9.9M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L006081/1NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG003284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For group-living animals traveling through heterogeneous landscapes, collective movement can be influenced by both habitat structure and social interactions. Yet research in collective behavior has largely neglected habitat influences on movement. Here we integrate simultaneous, high-resolution, tracking of wild baboons within a troop with a 3-dimensional reconstruction of their habitat to identify key drivers of baboon movement. A previously unexplored social influence - baboons' preference for locations that other troop members have recently traversed - is the most important predictor of individual movement decisions. Habitat is shown to influence movement over multiple spatial scales, from long-range attraction and repulsion from the troop's sleeping site, to relatively local influences including road-following and a short-range avoidance of dense vegetation. Scaling to the collective level reveals a clear association between habitat features and the emergent structure of the group, highlighting the importance of habitat heterogeneity in shaping group coordination.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalDecision MakingEcosystemLocomotionPapioAnimalsbaboons (Papio anubis)collective movementecologyhabitatmovement Ecologysocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID28139196
PMCPMC5283833
OpenAlexW2581420718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.