Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28139147›Full record

ArticleSubstance use & misuse2017

Social and Cultural Context of Betel Quid Consumption in Taiwan and Implications for Prevention and Cessation Interventions.

Cheng-Chieh Lin, Irene Tamí-Maury, Wei-Fen Ma, Cho Lam, Ming-Hsui Tsai, Mi-Ting Lin, Chia-Ing Li, Chiu-Shong Liu, Tsai-Chung Li, Chang-Fang Chiu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance use & misuse, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stigma, depression, and anxiety among patients with head and neck cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Plants with Anti-Addictive Potential.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cheng-Chieh Lina College of Medicine, China Medical University , Taichung , Taiwan.
Irene Tamí-Mauryb Department of Behavioral Science , University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , Texas , USA.
Wei-Fen Mac School of Nursing, China Medical University , Taichung , Taiwan.
Cho Lamd Department of Psychology , Rice University , Houston , Texas , USA.
Ming-Hsui Tsaia College of Medicine, China Medical University , Taichung , Taiwan.
Mi-Ting Linb Department of Behavioral Science , University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , Texas , USA.
Chia-Ing Lie Department of Medical Research , China Medical University , Taichung , Taiwan.
Chiu-Shong Liuf Department of Family Medicine , China Medical University , Taichung , Taiwan.
Tsai-Chung Lig College of Public Health, China Medical University , Taichung , Taiwan.
Chang-Fang Chiuh Department of Internal Medicine , China Medical University , Taichung , Taiwan.
I-Ying Lue Department of Medical Research , China Medical University , Taichung , Taiwan.
Ellen R Gritzb Department of Behavioral Science , University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , Texas , USA.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Taiwan, betel quid chewing is a part of social life for chewers. Betel quid itself, with or without tobacco, is a Group 1 human carcinogen. Betel quid chewing has become a severe health threat in Taiwan.

objectivesThe aim of the present study was to identify the individual, social, contextual, and cultural factors related to initiation, continuous use, and cessation of betel quid chewing.

methodsFour focus groups and 15 in depth face-to-face interviews were conducted in 2013 with current and former users of betel quid, members of a community organization located in central Taiwan. A thematic analysis identified themes evident across all groups.

resultsStudy participants (N = 41) were 66% male and 34% female; mean age was 40.34 ± 9.23 years. Participants stated that betel quid initiation usually occurs during childhood and that the most frequent reasons for chewing were: to follow cultural/social traditions, to achieve an energetic feeling, and to avoid boredom. Participants perceived betel quid chewing as an addiction and a risk factor for cancer and other health-related conditions. The most frequently mentioned barriers to quitting betel quid included: peer pressure and selected withdrawal symptoms.

conclusionsFor the development of culturally relevant and effective cessation interventions for betel quid in Taiwan, it is critical to understand and address perceptions of betel quid chewing and barriers to cessation.

Indexed as

ArecaCultureAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMalePsychologySubstance-Related DisordersTaiwanAboriginalBetel quidculture of betel quid usequalitative researchTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID28139147
PMCPMC13053182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.