ArticleBJU international2017
Prostate cancer screening practices in a large, integrated health system: 2007-2014.
Article in BJU international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prostate Cancer: Community Education and Disparities in Diagnosis and Treatment.The oncologist · 2021Pooled it
- Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a clinical practice guideline.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Guideline
- Values and preferences of men for undergoing prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2018Pooled it
- Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Pooled it
- Inflammation-immune-nutrition biomarkers and PSA variability: A population-based study on the clinical potential of the CALLY index.Biomedical reports · 2025Article
- Lessons from the implementation of the Australian 2016 prostate specific antigen testing clinical practice guidelines: a descriptive study.ANZ journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Chronological Trends of PSA Levels at Diagnosis in Population-based Prostate Cancer Data 2004-2021, a Time Period of Drastic Changes in Screening Guidelines: Potential Implications in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.Journal of registry management · 2025Article
- Association between platelet‑to‑lymphocyte ratio and serum prostate specific antigen.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- The use of electronic health records to inform cancer surveillance efforts: a scoping review and test of indicators for public health surveillance of cancer prevention and control.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Article
- Use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test in the United States for men age ≥65, 1999-2015: Implications for practice interventions.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Use of the prostate-specific antigen test in the U.S. for men age 30 to 64 in 2011 to 2017 using a large commercial claims database: Implications for practice interventions.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021Article
- The Association of Veterans' PSA Screening Rates With Changes in USPSTF Recommendations.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021Article
- Prostate-specific antigen testing after the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation: a population-based analysis of electronic health data.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2020Article
- Factors associated with appropriate and low-value PSA testing.Cancer epidemiology · 2020Article
- Psychosocial Stress, Glucocorticoid Signaling, and Prostate Cancer Health Disparities in African American Men.Cancer health disparities · 2020Article
- Time trends in prostate cancer screening in Swiss primary care (2010 to 2017) - A retrospective study.PloS one · 2019Article
- Prostate Cancer Screening among High-Risk Black Men.The journal for nurse practitioners : JNP · 2018Article
- Changes in the outcome of prostate biopsies after preventive task force recommendation against prostate-specific antigen screening.BMC urology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess prostate cancer screening practices in primary care since the initial United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for older men, and to assess primary provider variation associated with prostate cancer screening. PATIENTS AND
methodsOur study population included 160 211 men aged ≥40 years with at least one visit to a primary care clinic in any of the study years in a large, integrated health system. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical record data from January 2007 to December 2014. Yearly rates of screening PSA testing by primary care providers (PCPs), rates of re-screening, and rates of prostate biopsies were assessed.
resultsAnnual PSA-screening testing declined from 2007 to 2014 in all age groups, as did biennial and quadrennial screening. Yearly rates declined for men aged ≥70 years, from 22.8% to 8.9%; ages 50-69 years, from 39.2% to 20%; and ages 40-49 years, from 11% to 4.6%. Overall rates were lower for African-American (A-A) men vs non-A-A men; for men with a family history of prostate cancer, rates were similar or slightly higher than for those without a family history. PCP variation associated with ordering of PSA testing did not substantially change after the USPSTF recommendations. While the number of men screened and rates of follow-up prostate cancer screening declined in 2011-2014 compared to 2007-2010, similar re-screening rates were noted for men aged 45-75 years with initial PSA levels of <1 ng/mL or 1-3 ng/mL in both the earlier and later cohorts. For men aged >75 years with initial PSA levels of <3 ng/mL screened in both cohorts, follow-up screening rates were similar. Rates of prostate biopsy declined for men aged ≥70 years in 2014 compared to 2007. For men who had PSA screening, rates of first prostate biopsy increased in later years for A-A men and men with a family history of prostate cancer.
conclusionsProstate cancer screening declined from 2007 to 2014 even in higher-risk groups and follow-up screening rates were not related to previous PSA level. However, rates of first prostate biopsy in men who were screened with a PSA test were higher for men with an increased risk of prostate cancer in later years. Variation in PSA testing was noted among PCPs. Future work should further explore sources of variation in screening practices and implementation of risk-based strategies for prostate cancer screening in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.