Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28139018›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2017

The influence of social stress on time perception and psychophysiological reactivity.

Kathryne van Hedger, Elizabeth A Necka, Anam K Barakzai, Greg J Norman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Slower perception of time in depressed and suicidal patients.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  18. Sympathetic involvement in time-constrained sequential foraging.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathryne van HedgerDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3797-3434
Elizabeth A NeckaDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Anam K BarakzaiDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Greg J NormanDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for Cognitive and Social Neuroscience, Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Training in Emerging Multidisciplinary Approaches to Mental Health and DiseaseT32MH020065 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI NICOLAE, DAN LIVIU, RZHETSKY, ANDREY · 2002 to 2017
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time perception is a fundamental component of everyday life. Although time can be measured using standard units, the relationship between an individual's experience of perceived time and a standard unit is highly sensitive to context. Stressful and threatening stimuli have been previously shown to produce time distortion effects, such that individuals perceive the stimuli as lasting for different amounts of time as compared to a standard unit. As a highly social species, humans are acutely sensitive to social stressors; however, time distortion effects have not been studied in the context of social stress. We collected psychophysiological (electrocardiogram and impedance cardiography) and time perception data before, during, and after a modified version of the Trier Social Stress Test for 42 participants. Based on prior theories and evidence from the time perception literature, we hypothesized that experiencing a stressful event would result in time distortion. This hypothesis was supported by the data, with individuals on average reproducing short and long duration negative and positive stimuli as lasting longer after experiencing social stress, t(41) = -3.55, p = .001, and t(41) = -4.12, p < .001 for negative stimuli, and t(41) = -2.43, p = .02, and t(41) = -3.07, p = .004 for positive stimuli. However, changes in time perception were largely unrelated to psychophysiological reactivity to social stress. These findings are in line with some other studies of time distortion, and provide evidence for the interoceptive salience model of time perception. Implications for mechanisms of time distortion are discussed.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAdolescentAdultAutonomic Nervous SystemCardiography, ImpedanceElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart RateHumansMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychophysiologyStress, PsychologicalTime PerceptionYoung AdultHeart rate variabilityImpedance cardiographyPsychophysiologySocial stressTime perception

Identifiers

PMID28139018
PMCPMC5529171
OpenAlexW2583679173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.