Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28138912›Full record

ArticleDrugs & aging2017

Tolerability of Cholinesterase Inhibitors: A Population-Based Study of Persistence, Adherence, and Switching.

Anat Fisher, Greg Carney, Ken Bassett, Colin R Dormuth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & aging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Risk of rhabdomyolysis with donepezil compared with rivastigmine or galantamine: a population-based cohort study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019
    Article
  9. Resveratrol and cognitive decline: a clinician perspective.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2019
    Article
  10. Comparison of cholinesterase inhibitor safety in real-world practice.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anat FisherDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, 2176 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada. anat.fisher@ti.ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9730-5107
Greg CarneyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, 2176 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Ken BassettDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, 2176 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Colin R DormuthDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, 2176 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are prescribed to dementia patients despite their poor tolerance. Low tolerability potentially reduces persistence and adherence, while inducing switching between medications. Comparisons of these utilization measures contribute to knowledge of the relative tolerability of these medications.

aimThe aim was to compare persistence, adherence, and switching between donepezil, galantamine, oral rivastigmine, and rivastigmine patch.

methodsA population-based cohort study, using British Columbia claims data (2009-2013), assessed ChEI new users aged 40 and older. We conducted survival analysis to compare persistence and Poisson regression to estimate switching rates. Good adherence, defined as a medication possession ratio of ≥80%, was modeled using log-binomial regression. Analyses were adjusted using propensity scores.

resultsPatients on galantamine had longer mean persistence and better adherence compared with patients on donepezil, with a hazard ratio for discontinuation of 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-0.96] and a relative risk for good adherence of 1.01 (95% CI 1.002-1.03). Rivastigmine was associated with the shortest mean persistence [3.6 months (95% CI 3.0-4.2) and 5.0 (95% CI 4.7-5.3) for oral and patch, respectively] and the highest mean switching rates. Comparing the two rivastigmine preparations, the patch was associated with decreased discontinuation compared with oral [hazard ratio 0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.89)] and decreased switching [relative risk 0.63 (95% CI 0.46-0.87) during the first 6 months of treatment]. Paradoxically, the patch was also associated with poorer adherence [relative risk for good adherence 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.98)] than the oral formulation.

conclusionsBased on estimates of persistence, adherence, and switching, galantamine was the best tolerated ChEI and rivastigmine the least.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseCholinesterase InhibitorsDonepezilDrug ToleranceFemaleGalantamineHumansIndansMaleMedication AdherencePiperidinesRivastigmineCholinesterase InhibitorsDonepezilGalantamineIndansPiperidinesRivastigmine

Identifiers

PMID28138912
OpenAlexW2580510825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.