ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2017
The histopathological and pharmacodynamic effects of intradetrusor decorin injected in a rabbit partial bladder outlet obstruction model.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether or not the bladder function can be protected by supporting the detrusor with decorin levels during the fibrotic process.
methodsForty-two male rabbits were divided into three main groups, partial bladder outlet obstruction (pBOO) group, pBOO + intradetrusor decorin-injected (IDI) group and control group. Both pBOO and pBOO + IDI groups were divided into three subgroups according to the killing schedule. Histopathological, immunohistochemical and pharmacodynamics studies were performed for the evaluation of fibrotic process and tissue characteristics.
resultsHistopathological evaluation revealed statistically significant high fibrosis levels for both pBOO and pBOO + IDI groups when compared with control. Strikingly the antifibrotic effect of decorin was significant on 2nd, 4th and 8th week and increased as time passed. Immunohistochemical analysis was revealed high expressions of anti-TGF-β1 and decorin levels in all pBOO + IDI groups. Pharmacodynamical results were also revealed better contraction responses in favor of 2nd, 4th and 8th week groups of pBOO + IDI groups, when compared with pBOO groups. In addition, the contraction responses against the depolarizer agent KCl were increased in the three decorin-administrated groups.
conclusionOur study demonstrates the antifibrotic effects of decorin on bladder fibrosis. Strikingly, this antifibrotic effect is shown in histopathological, immunohistochemical and pharmacodynamics studies. Although further studies are warranted to make more decisive inferences regarding its clinical use, our study has the proper pride to be the first step of this time course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.