ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2017
[Ablation for atrial fibrillation in the elderly].
Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SPISE Index (Single-Point Insulin Sensitivity Estimator): A Long-Term Predictor of Recurrence in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation After Radiofrequency Ablation.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation is mainly an arrhythmia among the elderly. The current ESC guideline determines that there is no justification to deny atrial fibrillation ablation to any age group; however, the guideline does not provide specific scientific data. Thus, the goal of this article is to summarize the data on efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation ablation among elderly people and give treatment recommendations: (1) The success of atrial fibrillation ablation is the same between elderly and younger patients. (2) In cohort studies there was a trend to higher stroke rates among elderly people. (3) Negative predictors for stroke are an age >80 years, heart failure, stroke in history, or/and CHA
Indexed as
Identifiers
28138764What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.