Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28138720›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017

The dual mobility cup in muscular skeletal oncology: rationale and indications.

Carmine Zoccali, Dario Attala, Alessandra Scotto di Uccio, Barbara Rossi, Gennaro Scotto, Roberto Biagini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A geometric assessment method for estimating dimensional change of retrieved dual mobility liners for total hip arthroplasty.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. [Perioperative clinical characteristics of patients with pathological fracture of proximal femur].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Dual-mobility cup: a new French revolution.International orthopaedics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carmine ZoccaliOncological Orthopedics Department, IFO - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy. carminezoccali@libero.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8847-6772
Dario AttalaOncological Orthopedics Department, IFO - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra Scotto di UccioSchool of Medicine, University of Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Barbara RossiOncological Orthopedics Department, IFO - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy.
Gennaro ScottoOncological Orthopaedics Department, Galeazzi Orthopedic Research Institute, Via Galeazzi 4, Milan, Italy.
Roberto BiaginiOncological Orthopedics Department, IFO - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy.
Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri · ITIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITNational Cancer Institute · MYUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBecause of the improvement of medical therapy and the corresponding increase in life expectancy, orthopaedic surgeons are obliged to perform more wide resections rather than intramedullary stabilization nailing for patients affected by tumours of the hip compared to the past. Wide resection often causes joint instability, so prosthetic reconstruction presents a higher risk of dislocation than in primary osteoarthritis cases. The aim of the present paper is to classify the indications for the dual mobility cup (DMC) hip prosthesis based on the anatomic structures involved in the disease and to analyse the rationale to reduce the risk of dislocation.

methodsIndications were analyzed and classified based on all the cases in which the DMC prosthesis was used for reconstruction after hip resection in an oncological research hospital.

resultsFour classes of indications were identified; for classes I and IV the indication for DMC prosthesis can be considered strong; for classes II and III the indications must be evaluated considering the specific case, based on life expectancy, performance status, presence of osteoarthritis, and availability of adjuvant local therapies. When the DMC prosthesis is indicated, the cup should always be cemented, either alone or with augmentation techniques, to decrease the risk of mobilization due to local disease progression.

conclusionsDMC can be a valid alternative in reconstruction of the hip after tumor removal; nevertheless, prospective, randomized studies are necessary to verify the real dislocation rate based on the entity of resection.

Indexed as

AgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipBone NeoplasmsFemaleHip DislocationHip JointHip ProsthesisHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrthopedic SurgeonsProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureAcetabular tumorDual mobility cupHip prosthesisHip tumorModular prosthesisProximal femur tumor

Identifiers

PMID28138720
OpenAlexW2582847155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.