ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017
The dual mobility cup in muscular skeletal oncology: rationale and indications.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The iliac stemmed cup in reconstruction of the acetabular defects secondary to tumor resection: a systematic review of literature.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Pooled it
- The use of hook acetabular cage after intralesional surgery in secondary bone tumors of the acetabulum: indications and results at medium term.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2026Article
- A comparison of dislocation risk between dual mobility and traditional constructs used in proximal femoral replacement.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- A geometric assessment method for estimating dimensional change of retrieved dual mobility liners for total hip arthroplasty.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2023Article
- [Perioperative clinical characteristics of patients with pathological fracture of proximal femur].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2019Article
- Citations, non-citations and visibility of International Orthopaedics in 2017.International orthopaedics · 2018Article
- Dual-mobility cup: a new French revolution.International orthopaedics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBecause of the improvement of medical therapy and the corresponding increase in life expectancy, orthopaedic surgeons are obliged to perform more wide resections rather than intramedullary stabilization nailing for patients affected by tumours of the hip compared to the past. Wide resection often causes joint instability, so prosthetic reconstruction presents a higher risk of dislocation than in primary osteoarthritis cases. The aim of the present paper is to classify the indications for the dual mobility cup (DMC) hip prosthesis based on the anatomic structures involved in the disease and to analyse the rationale to reduce the risk of dislocation.
methodsIndications were analyzed and classified based on all the cases in which the DMC prosthesis was used for reconstruction after hip resection in an oncological research hospital.
resultsFour classes of indications were identified; for classes I and IV the indication for DMC prosthesis can be considered strong; for classes II and III the indications must be evaluated considering the specific case, based on life expectancy, performance status, presence of osteoarthritis, and availability of adjuvant local therapies. When the DMC prosthesis is indicated, the cup should always be cemented, either alone or with augmentation techniques, to decrease the risk of mobilization due to local disease progression.
conclusionsDMC can be a valid alternative in reconstruction of the hip after tumor removal; nevertheless, prospective, randomized studies are necessary to verify the real dislocation rate based on the entity of resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.