ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2016
Management of postoperative complications of lymphadenectomy.
Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Uncovering the Impact of Lymphadenectomy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Novel management indications for conservative treatment of chylous ascites after gastric cancer surgery.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Differences in examination results of small anastomotic fistula after radical gastrectomy with afterward treatments: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Factors associated with complication after gastrectomy for gastric or esophagogastric cancer compared among surgical purpose, surgical extent, and patient age: Retrospective study from a high volume center in Thailand.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Esophagojejunal anastomotic fistula: a major issue after radical total gastrectomy.Updates in surgery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer remains a disease with poor prognosis, mainly due to its late diagnosis. Surgery remains as the only treatment with curative intent, where the goal is radical resection with free-margin gastrectomy and extended lymphadenectomy. Over the last two decades there has been an improvement on postoperative outcomes. However, complications rate is still not negligible even in high volume specialized centers and are directly related mainly to the type of gastric resection: total or subtotal, combined with adjacent organs resection and the extension of lymphadenectomy (D1, D2 and D3). The aim of this study is to analyze the complications specific-related to lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.