Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28138419›Full record

ArticleCurrent clinical microbiology reports2016

Paramyxovirus Glycoproteins and the Membrane Fusion Process.

Hector C Aguilar, Bryce A Henderson, J Lizbeth Zamora, Gunner P Johnston

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current clinical microbiology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Syncytial therapeutics: Receptor-specific and direct-to-cytosol biologic drug delivery mediated by measles fusion complex.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Vaccine adjuvants for infectious disease in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hector C AguilarPaul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164; Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164; School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.
Bryce A HendersonPaul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164; School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.
J Lizbeth ZamoraPaul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.
Gunner P JohnstonSchool of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.
Washington State University · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Nipah virus fusion and entryR01AI109022 · NIAID · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI AGUILAR-CARRENO, HECTOR · 2014 to 2024
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI109022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The family

Indexed as

association modelattachmentattachment glycoproteindissociation modelF-triggeringfusionfusion cascadefusion glycoproteinfusion modelfusion pore formationHemifusionHendrahexamer of trimershMPVMeaslesmembrane fusionMumpsNDVNipahParamyxoviridaeParamyxoviruspostfusionprefusionprehairpin intermediateRSVsyncytiaviral entryviral receptors

Identifiers

PMID28138419
PMCPMC5270710
OpenAlexW2472651009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.