ArticleCurrent cardiovascular imaging reports2016
Normal Databases for the Relative Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion.
Article in Current cardiovascular imaging reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel Quantitative Analysis in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: How does it compare to the "Golden Eye"?Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Article
- Clinical reference values for left ventricular function and synchronicity parameters evaluated by GMPI in patients with a low pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered coronary artery disease diagnosis from SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a comprehensive deep learning study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Myocardial perfusion SPECT radiomic features reproducibility assessment: Impact of image reconstruction and harmonization.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Imaging Radiomic Features and Machine Learning Algorithms for Cardiac Contractile Pattern Recognition.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- Deep learning for myocardial ischemia auxiliary diagnosis using CZT SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2023Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of stress-only myocardial perfusion SPECT improved by deep learning.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Effect of reduced photon count levels and choice of normal data on semi-automated image assessment in cardiac SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Effect of reduced photon count levels and choice of normal data on semi-automated image assessment in cardiac SPECT: Doing more with fewer counts.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- V/Q SPECT for the Assessment of Regional Lung Function: Generation of Normal Mean and Standard Deviation 3-D Maps.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Article
- Impact of non-specific normal databases on perfusion quantification of low-dose myocardial SPECT studies.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Classification of Polar Maps from Cardiac Perfusion Imaging with Graph-Convolutional Neural Networks.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The long way to dose reduction in myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
- Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Review
- Factors affecting appearance of a normal myocardial perfusion scan.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
- Effect of nicorandil administration on myocardial microcirculation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewMyocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with SPECT is performed clinically worldwide to detect and monitor coronary artery disease (CAD). MPI allows an objective quantification of myocardial perfusion at stress and rest. This established technique relies on normal databases to compare patient scans against reference normal limits. In this review, we aim to introduce the process of MPI quantification with normal databases and describe the associated perfusion quantitative measures that are used. RECENT
findingsNew equipment and new software reconstruction algorithms have been introduced which require the development of new normal limits. The appearance and regional count variations of normal MPI scan may differ between these new scanners and standard Anger cameras. Therefore, these new systems may require the determination of new normal limits to achieve optimal accuracy in relative myocardial perfusion quantification. Accurate diagnostic and prognostic results rivaling those obtained by expert readers can be obtained by this widely used technique. SUMMARY: Throughout this review, we emphasize the importance of the different normal databases and the need for specific databases relative to distinct imaging procedures. use of appropriate normal limits allows optimal quantification of MPI by taking into account subtle image differences due to the hardware and software used, and the population studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.