Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28138048›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2017

Clinician Survey to Determine Knowledge of Dengue and Clinical Management Practices, Texas, 2014.

Jessica K Adam, Roman Abeyta, Brian Smith, Linda Gaul, Dana L Thomas, George Han, Tyler M Sharp, Stephen H Waterman, Kay M Tomashek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jessica K AdamEpidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Roman AbeytaTexas Department of State Health Services, Harlingen, Texas.
Brian SmithTexas Department of State Health Services, Harlingen, Texas.
Linda GaulTexas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas.
Dana L ThomasEpidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
George HanDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Tyler M SharpDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Stephen H WatermanDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Kay M TomashekDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue, a mosquito-borne viral disease, is increasingly being identified as a cause of outbreaks in the United States. During July-December 2013, a total of three south Texas counties reported 53 laboratory-confirmed dengue cases; 26 were locally acquired, constituting the largest outbreak in Texas since 2005. Because dengue outbreaks are expected to continue in south Texas and early case identification and timely treatment can reduce mortality, we sought to determine clinicians' knowledge of dengue and its clinical management. A survey was sent to 2,375 south Texas clinicians; 217 (9%) completed the survey. Approximately half of participants demonstrated knowledge needed to identify dengue cases, including symptoms (56%), early indicators of shock (54%), or timing of thrombocytopenia (48%). Fewer than 20% correctly identified all prevention messages, severe dengue warning signs, or circumstances in which a dengue patient should return for care. Knowledge of clinical management was limited; few participants correctly identified scenarios when plasma leakage occurred (10%) or a crystalloid solution was indicated (7%); however, 45% correctly identified when a blood transfusion was indicated. Because of the ongoing threat of dengue, we recommend clinicians in south Texas receive dengue clinical management training.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeDengueDengue VirusHumansPhysiciansProfessional CompetenceSevere DengueSurveys and QuestionnairesTexas

Identifiers

PMID28138048
PMCPMC5361550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.