GuidelineBMJ open2016
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.
Guideline in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,286 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Computed Tomography with Stress Maneuvers for Evaluation of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Instability in Adults After Acute Ankle Sprain: a Test Accuracy Study
Emergency PanorOmic Wide Association Study in Respiratory Infectious Disease (ePWAS-RID)
Start4All - Start Taking Action for TB Diagnosis SCREEN-TB
Spectral and Ultra High Resolution CT Systems for Non-Invasive Detection of Myocardial Ischemia: Stress CT Perfusion VS. FFR-CT
Who cites it
1,286 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosing Depression Through Behavioural Cues: A Diagnostic Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Pooled it
- SAGES-EAES systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of FLIP/impedance planimetry in the surgical work-up and management of GERD, achalasia, and gastroparesis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Working Length Determination in Endodontics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026Pooled it
- Recommendations for Research and Clinical Implementation of Ambulatory Assessment, Mood Monitoring, Digital Phenotyping, and Remote Measurement Technology in Mood Disorders: Synthesis of Systematic Review Findings.JMIR mental health · 2026Pooled it
- Accuracy of Diagnostic Codes and Algorithms Used to Identify Rheumatoid Arthritis and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in Administrative Claims and Electronic Health Records: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Arthritis care & research · 2026Pooled it
- Natural language processing for geriatric syndromes: a systematic review of methods, applications, and challenges.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- MMP-9 as a diagnostic salivary biomarker for early detection of oral cancers: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Mechanism-informed diagnostic accuracy of blood biomarkers for sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a systematic review and Bayesian diagnostic network meta-analysis.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of a Retinal Birefringence Scanning Device Compared With a Traditional Autorefraction Device.JAMA ophthalmology · 2026Trial
- Investigating the diagnostic accuracy of physical examination in digital nerve injury: a study within a trial.The Journal of hand surgery, European volume · 2026Trial
- Pulmonary Tuberculosis Detection with MiniDock MTB Using Swab Samples.The New England journal of medicine · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Clinical validation of artificial intelligence algorithms for the detection of different central-involved retinal pathologies and glaucoma from non-mydriatic images.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Trial
- Imaging characteristics of osteitis condensans ilii. A follow-up study.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Histopathology-correlated evaluation of magnetic resonance spectroscopy for high-grade glioma prediction: A small-scale neuro-oncology study with exploratory machine learning.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Article
- Can Artificial Intelligence Match Human Expertise in Long-Term Periodontal Prognosis? A Comparative Accuracy Study.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2026Article
- A diagnostic accuracy study of mitochondrial FMN during hypothermic oxygenated perfusion to guide liver utilization and avoid normothermic assessment.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2026Article
- Routine MRI for opportunistic osteoporosis screening: diagnostic accuracy of vertebral bone quality and a novel femoral bone quality score compared with DXA.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Cell-free DNA methylation markers in the diagnosis of hepatitis B virus-related- hepatocellular carcinoma: a review.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Development and Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Talaromyces marneffei Mp1p Lateral Flow Assay for Rapid Diagnosis of Talaromycosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
1,226 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnostic accuracy studies are, like other clinical studies, at risk of bias due to shortcomings in design and conduct, and the results of a diagnostic accuracy study may not apply to other patient groups and settings. Readers of study reports need to be informed about study design and conduct, in sufficient detail to judge the trustworthiness and applicability of the study findings. The STARD statement (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) was developed to improve the completeness and transparency of reports of diagnostic accuracy studies. STARD contains a list of essential items that can be used as a checklist, by authors, reviewers and other readers, to ensure that a report of a diagnostic accuracy study contains the necessary information. STARD was recently updated. All updated STARD materials, including the checklist, are available at http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/stard Here, we present the STARD 2015 explanation and elaboration document. Through commented examples of appropriate reporting, we clarify the rationale for each of the 30 items on the STARD 2015 checklist, and describe what is expected from authors in developing sufficiently informative study reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.