Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28137811›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Antimicrobial Activity of High-Proportion Cefepime-Tazobactam (WCK 4282) against a Large Number of Gram-Negative Isolates Collected Worldwide in 2014.

Helio S Sader, Mariana Castanheira, Rodrigo E Mendes, Robert K Flamm, Ronald N Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  8. New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Epidemiology and Diagnostics of Carbapenem Resistance in Gram-negative Bacteria.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Helio S SaderJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA helio-sader@jmilabs.com.
Mariana CastanheiraJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
Rodrigo E MendesJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
Robert K FlammJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
Ronald N JonesJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cefepime-tazobactam (WCK 4282) is currently under clinical development for use at a dosage of 2 g/2 g every 8 h. A total of 7,981 isolates were collected from 146 medical centers (39 countries) in 2014 as a part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, and their susceptibilities to cefepime-tazobactam (with tazobactam at fixed concentrations of 4 and 8 μg/ml) were tested by a reference broth microdilution method. Isolates were mainly from patients with pneumonia (29.5%) and bloodstream infections (26.9%). Cefepime-tazobactam (with tazobactam at a fixed concentration of 8 μg/ml) and cefepime inhibited 96.9 and 87.9% of

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCefepimeCephalosporinsEnterobacteriaceaeEscherichia coliGram-Negative BacteriaKlebsiella pneumoniaeMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPenicillanic AcidPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationTazobactamThienamycinsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCefepimeCephalosporinsMeropenemPenicillanic AcidPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationTazobactamThienamycinscefepime-tazobactam

Identifiers

PMID28137811
PMCPMC5365660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.