Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28137783›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017

Juggling confidentiality and safety: a qualitative study of how general practice clinicians document domestic violence in families with children.

Jessica Drinkwater, Nicky Stanley, Eszter Szilassy, Cath Larkins, Marianne Hester, Gene Feder

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Health needs of a hidden group: child residents of domestic abuse refuges.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  13. Exposure to domestic violence and abuse and consultations for emergency contraception: nested case-control study in a UK primary care dataset.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica DrinkwaterLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds.
Nicky StanleySchool of Social Work, Care and Community, University of Central Lancashire, Preston.
Eszter SzilassyCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Cath LarkinsSchool of Social Work, Care and Community, University of Central Lancashire, Preston.
Marianne HesterProfessor of gender, violence, and international policy, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Gene FederCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.
University of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDomestic violence and abuse (DVA) and child safeguarding are interlinked problems, impacting on all family members. Documenting in electronic patient records (EPRs) is an important part of managing these families. Current evidence and guidance, however, treats DVA and child safeguarding separately. This does not reflect the complexity clinicians face when documenting both issues in one family.

aimTo explore how and why general practice clinicians document DVA in families with children. DESIGN AND

settingA qualitative interview study using vignettes with GPs and practice nurses (PNs) in England.

methodSemi-structured telephone interviews with 54 clinicians (42 GPs and 12 PNs) were conducted across six sites in England. Data were analysed thematically using a coding frame incorporating concepts from the literature and emerging themes.

resultsMost clinicians recognised DVA and its impact on child safeguarding, but struggled to work out the best way to document it. They described tensions among the different roles of the EPR: a legal document; providing continuity of care; information sharing to improve safety; and a patient-owned record. This led to strategies to hide information, so that it was only available to other clinicians.

conclusionManaging DVA in families with children is complex and challenging for general practice clinicians. National integrated guidance is urgently needed regarding how clinicians should manage the competing roles of the EPR, while maintaining safety of the whole family, especially in the context of online EPRs and patient access.

Indexed as

Child Protective ServicesElectronic Health RecordsGeneral PractitionersAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAttitude of Health PersonnelChildChild AbuseConfidentialityContinuity of Patient CareCrime VictimsDomestic ViolenceEnglandFamilyFemaleHumanschild safeguardingdomestic violenceelectronic patient recordgeneral practiceprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID28137783
PMCPMC5442959
OpenAlexW2580806728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.