Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28137627›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2017

Prospective motion correction for 3D pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling using an external optical tracking system.

Murat Aksoy, Julian Maclaren, Roland Bammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rigid Motion Correction for Brain PET/MR Imaging using Optical Tracking.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Murat AksoyDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: maksoy@stanford.edu.
Julian MaclarenDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Roland BammerDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

Funding

X-RAY COMPATIBLE RF-COIL FOR MR IMAGINGP41RR009784 · NCRR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GLOVER, GARY H · 1995 to 2011
$15.0M
Training and DisseminationP41EB015891 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GLOVER, GARY H · 2012 to 2019
$10.7M
Improving SENSE MRI for Spiral and Echo-planar Imaging in StrokeR01EB002711 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERS, GREGORY W · 2003 to 2015
$5.1M
Short Axis EPI for Diffusion Tensor MRI at High FieldR01EB008706 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BAMMER, ROLAND · 2008 to 2011
$2.7M
Real-Time MRI Motion Correction SystemR01EB011654 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ZEINEH, MICHAEL M · 2010 to 2013
$2.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR009784NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015891NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002711NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB008706NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB011654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head motion is an unsolved problem in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of the brain. Real-time tracking using a camera has recently been proposed as a way to prevent head motion artifacts. As compared to navigator-based approaches that use MRI data to detect and correct motion, optical motion correction works independently of the MRI scanner, thus providing low-latency real-time motion updates without requiring any modifications to the pulse sequence. The purpose of this study was two-fold: 1) to demonstrate that prospective optical motion correction using an optical camera mitigates artifacts from head motion in three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (3D PCASL) acquisitions and 2) to assess the effect of latency differences between real-time optical motion tracking and navigator-style approaches (such as PROMO). An optical motion correction system comprising a single camera and a marker attached to the patient's forehead was used to track motion at a rate of 60fps. In the presence of motion, continuous tracking data from the optical system was used to update the scan plane in real-time during the 3D-PCASL acquisition. Navigator-style correction was simulated by using the tracking data from the optical system and performing updates only once per repetition time. Three normal volunteers and a patient were instructed to perform continuous and discrete head motion throughout the scan. Optical motion correction yielded superior image quality compared to uncorrected images or images using navigator-style correction. The standard deviations of pixel-wise CBF differences between reference and non-corrected, navigator-style-corrected and optical-corrected data were 14.28, 14.35 and 11.09mL/100g/min for continuous motion, and 12.42, 12.04 and 9.60mL/100g/min for discrete motion. Data obtained from the patient revealed that motion can obscure pathology and that application of optical prospective correction can successfully reveal the underlying pathology in the presence of head motion.

Indexed as

ArteriesArtifactsBrainHealthy VolunteersHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotionProspective StudiesSpin LabelsSpin LabelsArterial spin labelingOptical motion correctionProspective motion correction

Identifiers

PMID28137627
PMCPMC5514566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.