Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28137313›Full record

ReviewMolecular cancer2017

The evolving concept of liver cancer stem cells.

Kouki Nio, Taro Yamashita, Shuichi Kaneko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Understanding how hypoxia contributes to liver cancer stem cells maintenance.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Identification ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kouki NioLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Marsico Hall 5229 M, 125 Mason Farm Rd, 27599, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Taro YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, 13-1 Takara-Machi, 920-8641, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan. taroy@m-kanazawa.jp.
Shuichi KanekoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, 13-1 Takara-Machi, 920-8641, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver cancer is an often fatal malignant tumor with a high recurrence rate and chemoresistance. The major malignant phenotypes of cancer, including recurrence, metastasis, and chemoresistance, are related to the presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs). In the past few decades, CSCs have been identified and characterized in many tumors including liver cancer. Accumulated evidence has revealed many aspects of the biological behavior of liver CSCs and the mechanism of their regulation. Based on these findings, a number of studies have investigated eradication of liver CSCs. This review focuses on the recent advances in our understanding of the biology of liver CSCs and the development of strategies for their treatment.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansLiver NeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsRadiation ToleranceSignal TransductionBiomarkers, TumorCancer stem cellChemoresistanceLiver cancerNiche

Identifiers

PMID28137313
PMCPMC5282887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.