Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28135898›Full record

ReviewCell adhesion & migration2017

Going live with tumor exosomes and microvesicles.

Vincent Hyenne, Olivier Lefebvre, Jacky G Goetz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell adhesion & migration, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vincent Hyennea Inserm U1109, MN3T , Strasbourg , France.
Olivier Lefebvrea Inserm U1109, MN3T , Strasbourg , France.
Jacky G Goetza Inserm U1109, MN3T , Strasbourg , France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes, emerged as key drivers of the pro-tumorigenic dialog between the tumor mass and its microenvironment by mediating long and short distance communication. In vitro studies defined the capacity of tumor EVs to modify the phenotypes of stromal and tumor cells. These studies are now supported by a growing number of functional in vivo experiments. Remarkably, they allowed the identification of a new role for tumor EVs in priming the pre-metastatic niches (PMN). Several molecules transported in tumor EVs (RNAs and proteins) have recently been found to be essential for tumor progression and metastasis in vivo. In parallel, novel EV labeling and tracking strategies have very recently allowed the first descriptions of tumor EVs in vivo and pave the way for a better understanding of their function in realistic pathophysiological contexts. Here, we review the functional approaches and the recent progress in in vivo imaging of EVs, which have refined our understanding of the role played by tumor EVs. Finally, we emphasize the remaining challenges and open questions related to the biology of tumor EVs.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease ProgressionExosomesHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsStromal Cellsexosomeextracellular vesicleimagingmicrovesiclepre-metastatic niche

Identifiers

PMID28135898
PMCPMC5365253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.