ArticleAssessment2019
Development, Administration, and Structural Validity of a Brief, Computerized Neurocognitive Battery: Results From the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers.
Article in Assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Initial evaluation of a personalized advantage index to determine which individuals may benefit from mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for suicide prevention.Behaviour research and therapy · 2024Trial
- Attentional control may be modifiable with Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy to Prevent Suicide.Behaviour research and therapy · 2021Trial
- Measurement bias for age, sex, and years of education in selected RDoC tasks.Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology · 2026Article
- Multi-modal risk factors differentiate suicide attempters from ideators in military veterans with major depressive disorder.Journal of affective disorders · 2025Article
- Validation of the cognitive section of the Penn computerized adaptive test for neurocognitive and clinical psychopathology assessment (CAT-CCNB).Brain and cognition · 2024Article
- Predictors of within-individual variability in cognitive performance in schizophrenia in a South African case-control study.Acta neuropsychiatrica · 2023Article
- Construction of a computerized adaptive test (CAT-CCNB) for efficient neurocognitive and clinical psychopathology assessment.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2023Article
- Structural validity of a computerized neurocognitive battery for youth affected by human immunodeficiency virus in Botswana.Psychological assessment · 2022Article
- Association between neurocognitive functioning and suicide attempts in U.S. Army Soldiers.Journal of psychiatric research · 2022Article
- Adaptation and validation of a computerized neurocognitive battery in the Xhosa of South Africa.Neuropsychology · 2021Article
- Article
- Towards the objective assessment of suicidal states: Some neurocognitive deficits may be temporally related to suicide attempt.Psychiatry research · 2020Article
- Unifying the Notions of Modularity and Core-Periphery Structure in Functional Brain Networks during Youth.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020Article
- Common Data Elements for National Institute of Mental Health-Funded Translational Early Psychosis Research.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2020Review
- Effects of acute exposures to carbon dioxide on decision making and cognition in astronaut-like subjects.NPJ microgravity · 2019Article
- The Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS): progress toward understanding suicide among soldiers.Molecular psychiatry · 2019Review
- Improving risk prediction accuracy for new soldiers in the U.S. Army by adding self-report survey data to administrative data.BMC psychiatry · 2018Article
- Individual variation in working memory is associated with fear extinction performance.Behaviour research and therapy · 2018Article
- Using self-report surveys at the beginning of service to develop multi-outcome risk models for new soldiers in the U.S. Army.Psychological medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS) is a research project aimed at identifying risk and protective factors for suicide and related mental health outcomes among Army Soldiers. The New Soldier Study component of Army STARRS included the assessment of a range of cognitive- and emotion-processing domains linked to brain systems related to suicidal behavior including posttraumatic stress disorder, mood disorders, substance use disorders, and impulsivity. We describe the design and application of the Army STARRS neurocognitive test battery to a sample of 56,824 soldiers. We investigate its structural and concurrent validity through factor analysis and correlation of scores with demographics. We conclude that, in addition to being composed of previously well-validated measures, the Army STARRS neurocognitive battery as a whole demonstrates good psychometric properties. Correlations of scores with age and sex differences mostly replicate previously published findings, highlighting moderate to large effect sizes even within this restricted age range. Factor structures of scores conform to theoretical expectations. This neurocognitive battery provides a brief, valid measurement of neurocognition that may be helpful in predicting mental health and military performance. These measures can be integrated with neuroimaging to offer a powerful tool for assessing neurocognition in Servicemembers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.