Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28135719›Full record

SynthesisNature2017

Prevalence and architecture of de novo mutations in developmental disorders.

Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 822 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
822citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
155.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

822 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,584 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Clonazepam repurposing inJournal of medical genetics · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Can It Happen Again? Using Co-Produced Theatre to Explore the Challenges Faced by Couples Considering Pregnancy After a De Novo Genetic Diagnosis in a Child.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. AScience advances · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

762 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800270Medical Research Council G0800674Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127561093Medical Research Council MR/M014568/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genomes of individuals with severe, undiagnosed developmental disorders are enriched in damaging de novo mutations (DNMs) in developmentally important genes. Here we have sequenced the exomes of 4,293 families containing individuals with developmental disorders, and meta-analysed these data with data from another 3,287 individuals with similar disorders. We show that the most important factors influencing the diagnostic yield of DNMs are the sex of the affected individual, the relatedness of their parents, whether close relatives are affected and the parental ages. We identified 94 genes enriched in damaging DNMs, including 14 that previously lacked compelling evidence of involvement in developmental disorders. We have also characterized the phenotypic diversity among these disorders. We estimate that 42% of our cohort carry pathogenic DNMs in coding sequences; approximately half of these DNMs disrupt gene function and the remainder result in altered protein function. We estimate that developmental disorders caused by DNMs have an average prevalence of 1 in 213 to 1 in 448 births, depending on parental age. Given current global demographics, this equates to almost 400,000 children born per year.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAutoantigensCasein Kinase IICDC2 Protein KinaseChildChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohort StudiesDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDevelopmental DisabilitiesDNA-Binding ProteinsExomeFemaleHeredityHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHomeodomain ProteinsADNP protein, humanANKRD11 protein, humanARID1B protein, humanAutoantigensCasein Kinase IICDC2 Protein KinaseCDK13 protein, humanCHD4 protein, humanChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCSNK2A1 protein, humanDDX3X protein, humanDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNA-Binding ProteinsHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHomeodomain ProteinsKMT2A protein, humanMi-2 Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylase ComplexMSL3 protein, humanMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia ProteinNerve Tissue ProteinsPPM1D protein, humanProtein Phosphatase 2Cras GTPase-Activating ProteinsRepressor ProteinsSYNGAP1 protein, humanTCF20 protein, humanTranscription FactorsZBTB18 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28135719
PMCPMC6016744
OpenAlexW2581649032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.