Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28135718›Full record

ArticleNature2017

Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination network resilience and function.

Christopher N Kaiser-Bunbury, James Mougal, Andrew E Whittington, Terence Valentin, Ronny Gabriel, Jens M Olesen, Nico Blüthgen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
65.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 410 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Landscape homogenization strengthens the fitness benefits of plant species' centrality in pollination networks.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Species-habitat networks reveal conservation implications that other community analyses do not detect.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Christopher N Kaiser-BunburyEcological Networks, Department of Biology, TU Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
James MougalSeychelles National Parks Authority, PO Box 1240, Mahé, Seychelles.
Andrew E WhittingtonDepartment of Archaeology, Anthropology &Forensic Science, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK.
Terence ValentinSeychelles National Parks Authority, PO Box 1240, Mahé, Seychelles.
Ronny GabrielSeychelles National Parks Authority, PO Box 1240, Mahé, Seychelles.
Jens M OlesenEcology and Genetics, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Nico BlüthgenEcological Networks, Department of Biology, TU Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Technical University of Darmstadt · DEAarhus University · DKBournemouth University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land degradation results in declining biodiversity and the disruption of ecosystem functioning worldwide, particularly in the tropics. Vegetation restoration is a common tool used to mitigate these impacts and increasingly aims to restore ecosystem functions rather than species diversity. However, evidence from community experiments on the effect of restoration practices on ecosystem functions is scarce. Pollination is an important ecosystem function and the global decline in pollinators attenuates the resistance of natural areas and agro-environments to disturbances. Thus, the ability of pollination functions to resist or recover from disturbance (that is, the functional resilience) may be critical for ensuring a successful restoration process. Here we report the use of a community field experiment to investigate the effects of vegetation restoration, specifically the removal of exotic shrubs, on pollination. We analyse 64 plant-pollinator networks and the reproductive performance of the ten most abundant plant species across four restored and four unrestored, disturbed mountaintop communities. Ecosystem restoration resulted in a marked increase in pollinator species, visits to flowers and interaction diversity. Interactions in restored networks were more generalized than in unrestored networks, indicating a higher functional redundancy in restored communities. Shifts in interaction patterns had direct and positive effects on pollination, especially on the relative and total fruit production of native plants. Pollinator limitation was prevalent at unrestored sites only, where the proportion of flowers producing fruit increased with pollinator visitation, approaching the higher levels seen in restored plant communities. Our results show that vegetation restoration can improve pollination, suggesting that the degradation of ecosystem functions is at least partially reversible. The degree of recovery may depend on the state of degradation before restoration intervention and the proximity to pollinator source populations in the surrounding landscape. We demonstrate that network structure is a suitable indicator for pollination quality, highlighting the usefulness of interaction networks in environmental management.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAltitudeAnimalsFlowersFruitIntroduced SpeciesModels, BiologicalPollinationSeychelles

Identifiers

PMID28135718
OpenAlexW2582575549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.