Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28135594›Full record

ArticleEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2017

Experiences of remote mood and activity monitoring in bipolar disorder: A qualitative study.

K E A Saunders, A C Bilderbeck, P Panchal, L Z Atkinson, J R Geddes, G M Goodwin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K E A SaundersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford hospital, OX3 7JX Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, OX3 7JX Oxford, UK.
A C BilderbeckDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford hospital, OX3 7JX Oxford, UK.
P PanchalDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford hospital, OX3 7JX Oxford, UK.
L Z AtkinsonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford hospital, OX3 7JX Oxford, UK.
J R GeddesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford hospital, OX3 7JX Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, OX3 7JX Oxford, UK.
G M GoodwinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford hospital, OX3 7JX Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, OX3 7JX Oxford, UK. Electronic address: guy.goodwin@psych.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBWarneford Hospital · GBOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 102,616/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile technology enables high frequency mood monitoring and automated passive collection of data (e.g. actigraphy) from patients more efficiently and less intrusively than has previously been possible. Such techniques are increasingly being deployed in research and clinical settings however little is known about how such approaches are experienced by patients. Here, we explored the experiences of individuals with bipolar disorder engaging in a study involving mood and activity monitoring with a range of portable and wearable technologies.

methodPatients were recruited from a wider sample of 50 individuals with Bipolar Disorder taking part in the Automated Monitoring of Symptom Severity (AMoSS) study in Oxford. A sub-set of 21 patients participated in a qualitative interview that followed a semi-structured approach.

resultsMonitoring was associated with benefits including increased illness insight, behavioural change. Concerns were raised about the potential preoccupation with, and paranoia about, monitoring. Patients emphasized the need for personalization, flexibility, and the importance of context, when monitoring mood.

conclusionsMobile and electronic health approaches have potential to lend new insights into mental health and transform healthcare. Capitalizing on the perceived utility of these approaches from the patients' perspective, while addressing their concerns, will be essential for the promise of new technologies to be realised.

Indexed as

AffectSelf ReportAdultBipolar DisorderFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsQualitative ResearchSelf-AssessmentTelemedicineActivityAmbulatory monitoringBipolar disorderMood monitoringWearable devices

Identifiers

PMID28135594
PMCPMC5947817
OpenAlexW2580300136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.