ArticleCognition2017
Chimpanzees process structural isomorphisms across sensory modalities.
Article in Cognition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- What role does temporal synchrony play in mid-level audiovisual crossmodal correspondences?Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Cross-modal synchrony between music and visual motion modulates vection, urge to move, and comfort in VR.Virtual reality · 2026Article
- Augmenting art crossmodally: possibilities and pitfalls.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
- Sensory translation between audition and vision.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Review
- Abstract representations of small sets in newborns.Cognition · 2022Article
- Nonhuman primates learn adjacent dependencies but fail to learn nonadjacent dependencies in a statistical learning task with a salient cue.Learning & behavior · 2022Article
- Nonadjacent dependency processing in monkeys, apes, and humans.Science advances · 2020Article
- Non-adjacent Dependency Learning in Humans and Other Animals.Topics in cognitive science · 2020Review
- Sound symbolic congruency detection in humans but not in great apes.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Positional encoding in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).Animal cognition · 2019Article
- Common marmosets are sensitive to simple dependencies at variable distances in an artificial grammar.Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society · 2019Article
- Auditory and Visual Sequence Learning in Humans and Monkeys using an Artificial Grammar Learning Paradigm.Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Article
- Perceptual Tuning Influences Rule Generalization: Testing Humans With Monkey-Tailored Stimuli.i-PerceptionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evolution has shaped animal brains to detect sensory regularities in environmental stimuli. In addition, many species map one-dimensional quantities across sensory modalities, such as conspecific faces to voices, or high-pitched sounds to bright light. If basic patterns like repetitions and identities are frequently perceived in different sensory modalities, it could be advantageous to detect cross-modal isomorphisms, i.e. develop modality-independent representations of structural features, exploitable in visual, tactile, and auditory processing. While cross-modal mappings are common in the animal kingdom, the ability to map similar (isomorphic) structures across domains has been demonstrated in humans but no other animals. We tested cross-modal isomorphisms in two chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Individuals were previously trained to choose structurally 'symmetric' image sequences (two identical geometrical shapes separated by a different shape) presented beside 'edge' sequences (two identical shapes preceded or followed by a different one). Here, with no additional training, the choice between symmetric and edge visual sequences was preceded by playback of three concatenated sounds, which could be symmetric (mimicking the symmetric structure of reinforced images) or edge. The chimpanzees spontaneously detected a visual-auditory isomorphism. Response latencies in choosing symmetric sequences were shorter when presented with (structurally isomorphic) symmetric, rather than edge, sound triplets: The auditory stimuli interfered, based on their structural properties, with processing of the learnt visual rule. Crucially, the animals had neither been exposed to the acoustic sequences before the experiment, nor were they trained to associate sounds to images. Our result provides the first evidence of structure processing across modalities in a non-human species. It suggests that basic cross-modal abstraction capacities transcend linguistic abilities and might involve evolutionary ancient neural mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.