ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2017
Diabatic-At-Construction Method for Diabatic and Adiabatic Ground and Excited States Based on Multistate Density Functional Theory.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Orthogonal Electronic State View on Charge Delocalization and Transfer.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2026Article
- Chemical Bonding from the Perspective ofThe journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Excited States by Coupling Piris Natural Orbital Functionals with the Extended Random-Phase Approximation.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Review
- Excimer Energies.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2023Article
- Multistate Density Functional Theory of Excited States.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2022Article
- Electronic structure of strongly correlated systems: recent developments in multiconfiguration pair-density functional theory and multiconfiguration nonclassical-energy functional theory.Chemical science · 2022Review
- Minimal Active Space for Diradicals Using Multistate Density Functional Theory.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Block-Localized Excitation for Excimer Complex and Diabatic Coupling.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2021Article
- Generalization of Block-Localized Wave Function for Constrained Optimization of Excited Determinants.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2021Article
- Minimal-active-space multistate density functional theory for excitation energy involving local and charge transfer states.npj computational materials · 2021Article
- Combined Multistate and Kohn-Sham Density Functional Theory Studies of the Elusive Mechanism ofFrontiers in chemistry · 2018Article
- Spin-Multiplet Components and Energy Splittings by Multistate Density Functional Theory.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We describe a diabatic-at-construction (DAC) strategy for defining diabatic states to determine the adiabatic ground and excited electronic states and their potential energy surfaces using the multistate density functional theory (MSDFT). The DAC approach differs in two fundamental ways from the adiabatic-to-diabatic (ATD) procedures that transform a set of preselected adiabatic electronic states to a new representation. (1) The DAC states are defined in the first computation step to form an active space, whose configuration interaction produces the adiabatic ground and excited states in the second step of MSDFT. Thus, they do not result from a similarity transformation of the adiabatic states as in the ATD procedure; they are the basis for producing the adiabatic states. The appropriateness and completeness of the DAC active space can be validated by comparison with experimental observables of the ground and excited states. (2) The DAC diabatic states are defined using the valence bond characters of the asymptotic dissociation limits of the adiabatic states of interest, and they are strictly maintained at all molecular geometries. Consequently, DAC diabatic states have specific and well-defined physical and chemical meanings that can be used for understanding the nature of the adiabatic states and their energetic components. Here we present results for the four lowest singlet states of LiH and compare them to a well-tested ATD diabatization method, namely the 3-fold way; the comparison reveals both similarities and differences between the ATD diabatic states and the orthogonalized DAC diabatic states. Furthermore, MSDFT can provide a quantitative description of the ground and excited states for LiH with multiple strongly and weakly avoided curve crossings spanning over 10 Å of interatomic separation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.