Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28135420›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2017

Diabatic-At-Construction Method for Diabatic and Adiabatic Ground and Excited States Based on Multistate Density Functional Theory.

Adam Grofe, Zexing Qu, Donald G Truhlar, Hui Li, Jiali Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chemical Bonding from the Perspective ofThe journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Excimer Energies.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2023
    Article
  6. Multistate Density Functional Theory of Excited States.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Block-Localized Excitation for Excimer Complex and Diabatic Coupling.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam GrofeInstitute of Theoretical Chemistry, Jilin University , Changchun, Jilin Province 130023, China.
Zexing QuInstitute of Theoretical Chemistry, Jilin University , Changchun, Jilin Province 130023, China.
Donald G TruhlarDepartment of Chemistry and Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7742-7294
Hui LiInstitute of Theoretical Chemistry, Jilin University , Changchun, Jilin Province 130023, China.
Jiali GaoInstitute of Theoretical Chemistry, Jilin University , Changchun, Jilin Province 130023, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0106-7154

Funding

BIOMOLECULAR INTERACTIONS AND ENZYMATIC PROCESSESR01GM046736 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI JIALI GAO · 1993 to 2026
$6.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a diabatic-at-construction (DAC) strategy for defining diabatic states to determine the adiabatic ground and excited electronic states and their potential energy surfaces using the multistate density functional theory (MSDFT). The DAC approach differs in two fundamental ways from the adiabatic-to-diabatic (ATD) procedures that transform a set of preselected adiabatic electronic states to a new representation. (1) The DAC states are defined in the first computation step to form an active space, whose configuration interaction produces the adiabatic ground and excited states in the second step of MSDFT. Thus, they do not result from a similarity transformation of the adiabatic states as in the ATD procedure; they are the basis for producing the adiabatic states. The appropriateness and completeness of the DAC active space can be validated by comparison with experimental observables of the ground and excited states. (2) The DAC diabatic states are defined using the valence bond characters of the asymptotic dissociation limits of the adiabatic states of interest, and they are strictly maintained at all molecular geometries. Consequently, DAC diabatic states have specific and well-defined physical and chemical meanings that can be used for understanding the nature of the adiabatic states and their energetic components. Here we present results for the four lowest singlet states of LiH and compare them to a well-tested ATD diabatization method, namely the 3-fold way; the comparison reveals both similarities and differences between the ATD diabatic states and the orthogonalized DAC diabatic states. Furthermore, MSDFT can provide a quantitative description of the ground and excited states for LiH with multiple strongly and weakly avoided curve crossings spanning over 10 Å of interatomic separation.

Identifiers

PMID28135420
PMCPMC5793876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.