Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28135246›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2017

Avian W and mammalian Y chromosomes convergently retained dosage-sensitive regulators.

Daniel W Bellott, Helen Skaletsky, Ting-Jan Cho, Laura Brown, Devin Locke, Nancy Chen, Svetlana Galkina, Tatyana Pyntikova, Natalia Koutseva, Tina Graves and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel W BellottWhitehead Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Helen SkaletskyWhitehead Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Ting-Jan ChoWhitehead Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Laura BrownWhitehead Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Devin LockeMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Nancy ChenDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Svetlana GalkinaSaint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Tatyana PyntikovaWhitehead Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Natalia KoutsevaWhitehead Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Tina GravesMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Colin KremitzkiMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Wesley C WarrenMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Andrew G ClarkDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Elena GaginskayaSaint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Richard K WilsonMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
David C PageWhitehead Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5489-6453
James S. McDonnell Foundation · USWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USCornell University · USSt Petersburg University · RU

Funding

MAPPING THE HUMAN Y CHROMOSOMER01HG000257 · NHGRI · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI PAGE, DAVID C. · 1991 to 2013
$15.3M
Making structurally complex genomic regions accessibleR01HG007852 · NHGRI · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI PAGE, DAVID C. · 2015 to 2017
$2.7M
Beyond the reproductive tract: The future of Y chromosome researchU01HG007587 · NHGRI · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI MUENKE, MAXIMILIAN, PAGE, DAVID C. · 2015 to 2017
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG000257NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007852NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After birds diverged from mammals, different ancestral autosomes evolved into sex chromosomes in each lineage. In birds, females are ZW and males are ZZ, but in mammals females are XX and males are XY. We sequenced the chicken W chromosome, compared its gene content with our reconstruction of the ancestral autosomes, and followed the evolutionary trajectory of ancestral W-linked genes across birds. Avian W chromosomes evolved in parallel with mammalian Y chromosomes, preserving ancestral genes through selection to maintain the dosage of broadly expressed regulators of key cellular processes. We propose that, like the human Y chromosome, the chicken W chromosome is essential for embryonic viability of the heterogametic sex. Unlike other sequenced sex chromosomes, the chicken W chromosome did not acquire and amplify genes specifically expressed in reproductive tissues. We speculate that the pressures that drive the acquisition of reproduction-related genes on sex chromosomes may be specific to the male germ line.

Indexed as

AnimalsBirdsEvolution, MolecularFemaleGene DosageHumansMaleMammalsSex Determination ProcessesTranscription FactorsX ChromosomeY ChromosomeTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID28135246
PMCPMC5359078
OpenAlexW2582329608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.