Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28135127›Full record

ArticleLymphatic research and biology2017

ELM: A New, Simple, and Economic Assay to Measure Motility of Lymphatic Endothelial Cells.

Fabio Torri, Patrizia Dell'Era, Emirena Garrafa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lymphatic research and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fabio Torri1 Department of Surgery, ASST-Spedali Civili Brescia , Brescia, Italy .
Patrizia Dell'Era2 Cellular Fate Reprogramming Unit, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia , Brescia, Italy .
Emirena Garrafa1 Department of Surgery, ASST-Spedali Civili Brescia , Brescia, Italy .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelatively few attempts have been made to set up an assay that allows the measurement of lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) motility. Nowadays, the most widely used methods involve adaptation of the Boyden chamber method or the wound scratch assay, both of them showing some limitations due to long and expensive setup and high variability. METHODS AND

resultsWe propose a new, economic, and easy to setup LEC Motility (ELM) assay that will contribute to the study of lymphangiogenesis. The experimental setup consists of extending the coating of the flask with extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins also at the area opposite to the cap, where the LECs will be initially seeded at various densities. The day after, the flasks will be inclined at an angle of about 20° to cover the entire coated surface. Twenty-four hours later, flasks will be moved to the standard position, and the motility of the cells will be easily observed. Using the ELM assay, we were able to compare the motility rate of LECs isolated from different origins, or seeded on different substrates.

conclusionWe propose the use of a new method to evaluate the motility of LECs: the ELM assay. This cost-effective analysis has several advantages: It can be easily set up in any cell biology laboratory, can be carried out rapidly, and allows the monitoring of cellular motility for a long period.

Indexed as

Cell MovementBiomarkersCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedEndothelial CellsHumansImmunohistochemistryImmunophenotypingLymphatic VesselsMicroscopyBiomarkersBoyden chambereconomiclymphatic endothelial cellsmotility assaywound scratch assay

Identifiers

PMID28135127
PMCPMC5369396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.