Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28134800›Full record

ReviewCancers2017

Immune Modulation by Androgen Deprivation and Radiation Therapy: Implications for Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy.

Jennifer L Kalina, David S Neilson, Alexandra P Comber, Jennifer M Rauw, Abraham S Alexander, Joanna Vergidis, Julian J Lum

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. PROQURE-I: a phase I study adding concurrent [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer L KalinaTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada. Jennifer.Kalina@bccancer.bc.ca.
David S NeilsonTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada. dneilson@bccrc.ca.
Alexandra P ComberTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada. acomber@bccrc.ca.
Jennifer M RauwBritish Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, V8R 6V5, Canada. Jennifer.Rauw@bccancer.bc.ca.
Abraham S AlexanderBritish Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, V8R 6V5, Canada. AAlexander3@bccancer.bc.ca.
Joanna VergidisBritish Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, V8R 6V5, Canada. JVergidis@bccancer.bc.ca.
Julian J LumTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada. jjlum@bccancer.bc.ca.
BC Cancer Agency · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer patients often receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with radiation therapy (RT). Recent evidence suggests that both ADT and RT have immune modulatory properties. First, ADT can cause infiltration of lymphocytes into the prostate, although it remains unclear whether the influx of lymphocytes is beneficial, particularly with the advent of new classes of androgen blockers. Second, in rare cases, radiation can elicit immune responses that mediate regression of metastatic lesions lying outside the field of radiation, a phenomenon known as the abscopal response. In light of these findings, there is emerging interest in exploiting any potential synergy between ADT, RT, and immunotherapy. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the rationale behind combining immunotherapy with ADT and RT for the treatment of prostate cancer, including an examination of the current clinical trials that employ this combination. The reported outcomes of several trials demonstrate the promise of this combination strategy; however, further scrutiny is needed to elucidate how these standard therapies interact with immune modulators. In addition, we discuss the importance of synchronizing immune modulation relative to ADT and RT, and provide insight into elements that may impact the ability to achieve maximum synergy between these treatments.

Indexed as

androgen deprivation therapycancer vaccinescheckpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapyprostate cancerradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID28134800
PMCPMC5332936
OpenAlexW2581972122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.