Observational studyThe British journal of radiology2017
In utero MR imaging in fetuses at high risk of lissencephaly.
Observational study in The British journal of radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fetal malformations of cortical development: review and clinical guidance.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Coexisting Congenital Mesoblastic Nephroma and Lissencephaly: Unique Case Report with Pathological Analysis and Its Clinical Significance.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Cutting-edge applications of fetal MR neuro-imaging in clinical routine: a pictorial essay.Neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Value of pre- and postnatal magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of congenital central nervous system anomalies.Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
- Perinatal post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the central nervous system (CNS): a pictorial review.Insights into imaging · 2021Review
- Changes in appearance of cortical formation abnormalities in the foetus detected on sequential in utero MR imaging.European radiology · 2021Article
- Cortical formation abnormalities on foetal MR imaging: a proposed classification system trialled on 356 cases from Italian and UK centres.European radiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLissencephaly is a rare disorder of cortical developmental, which usually carries increased risk of recurrence in future pregnancies. In this prospective observational study, we wished to test the hypothesis that sulcation patterns can be used to diagnose lissencephaly successfully on in utero MR (iuMR) imaging in the third-trimester but not in the late second-trimester fetus.
methodsPregnant females were recruited into this study if they had an increased risk of fetal lissencephaly based on a fetus or child with lissencephaly in an earlier pregnancy. All females were offered serial iuMR examinations at one centre and are reported whether they had at least two examinations. The overall recurrence rate of lissencephaly was recorded along with the sulcation patterns of non-affected fetuses.
results19 females were recruited with 23 pregnancies. In 3/23 (13%) fetuses, lissencephaly was diagnosed on iuMR and not detected on ultrasonography. In two cases, the diagnosis of lissencephaly was made on second-trimester iuMR imaging-with certainty in one and described as "possible" in the other. Confident diagnoses of lissencephaly were made by 28-week gestation in all three cases. Four fetuses, ultimately shown not to have lissencephaly, were judged to have minor sulcation delay on second-trimester imaging but became gestational age appropriate in the third trimester.
conclusioniuMR imaging can identify fetal lissencephaly between 20 and 24 weeks, but false positives should be expected, particularly in the second trimester, and follow-up imaging later in pregnancy may be required. Advances in knowledge: It is possible to detect fetal lissencephaly between 20- and 24-week gestational age; but, it is considerably easier in the third trimester. As a result, if a fetus has an increased risk of lissencephaly on the basis of family history, it may be necessary to do serial iuMR studies to confirm normality (or abnormality) of the fetal brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.