Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28134258›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2017

SUMO and the robustness of cancer.

Jacob-Sebastian Seeler, Anne Dejean

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 274 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
274citing papers in PubMed
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

274 citing papers in PubMed, 429 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Aging and cancer: current understandings and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Regulation of lineage reprogramming by dynamic chromatin SUMOylation.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Aberrant SUMOylation Restricts the Targetable Cancer Immunopeptidome.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Ubiquitin-conjugating Enzymes in Cancer.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review

214 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacob-Sebastian SeelerNuclear Organization and Oncogenesis Unit, INSERM U993, Institut Pasteur, 28 rue de Dr Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France.
Anne DejeanNuclear Organization and Oncogenesis Unit, INSERM U993, Institut Pasteur, 28 rue de Dr Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France.
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-translational protein modification by small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO), termed sumoylation, is an important mechanism in cellular responses to stress and one that appears to be upregulated in many cancers. Here, we examine the role of sumoylation in tumorigenesis as a possibly necessary safeguard that protects the stability and functionality of otherwise easily misregulated gene expression programmes and signalling pathways of cancer cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell HypoxiaCellular SenescenceDNA DamageDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGene Expression RegulationHumansNeoplasmsNF-kappa BSignal TransductionSUMO-1 ProteinSumoylationNF-kappa BSUMO-1 Protein

Identifiers

PMID28134258
OpenAlexW2581489880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.